Here is the order in Manzanita Band of the Kumeyaay Nation v. Wolf:
Order on Motion for Stay Pending Appeal + Dissent
Briefs:
Appellants Motion for Emergency Injunction
Lower court materials here.
Here is the order in Manzanita Band of the Kumeyaay Nation v. Wolf:
Order on Motion for Stay Pending Appeal + Dissent
Briefs:
Appellants Motion for Emergency Injunction
Lower court materials here.
“Thirty years after Congress passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, only a fraction of human remains held by Texas’ museums and universities have been returned.”
Here.

NAGPRA: 30 Years and Beyond
Monday, Nov. 16
12:00-1:30 p.m. MST
Join us as we commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) and explore new opportunities for building on this landmark legislation.
Guest speakers:
– Suzan Harjo (Cheyenne & Hodulgee Muscogee) – Writer/Curator/Policy Advocate/President, Morning Star Institute
– Shannon O’Loughlin (Choctaw) – Executive Director and Attorney, Association on American Indian Affairs
– James Riding In (Pawnee) – Founding Member and Associate Professor, American Indian Studies, Arizona State University
The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. This activity may qualify for up to 1.0 hour toward your annual CLE requirement for the State Bar of Arizona.
Free webinar and open to the public.
Register for this free webinar at: law.asu.edu/nagpra
Here are the materials in Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. Wolf (D.D.C.):
6th Annual Repatriation Conference
Growing Community & Moving Forward after 30 Years of NAGPRA
An ALL VIRTUAL Community Conference
October 26 – 28, 2020
| The Association on American Indian Affairs and the University of Denver Museum of Anthropology is partnering for the 6th Annual Repatriation Conference. Because of the coronavirus pandemic, the Conference will be completely virtual and formatted for active participation and networking among participants from Indian Country, institutions, federal agencies, international institutions, attorneys, academics and others interested in repatriation and Indigenous human rights work. |

Here is the complaint in Rosales v. United States (E.D. Cal.):
Here.
Here are the materials in Rosales v. Dutschke (E.D. Cal.):
62-1 Tribally Related Defendants Motion to Dismiss
You must be logged in to post a comment.