Here is the complaint in Sxʷnq̓ʔels l Suw̓ečm / Ksukⱡiⱡmumaⱡ ʾA·kጦaⱡmukwaʾits d/b/a Energy Keepers Inc. v. Hyperblock LLC (D. Mont.):
Section 17 corporation
Amerind Risk Management Corp. v. Blackfeet Housing — Complaint to Compel Arbitration
Voluntary Dismissal Order in Begay v. Begay
Federal Court Denies TRO in Begay v. Begay
Update in Begay v Begay
Complaint Filed re: Control of Navajo Nation Oil & Gas Company — UPDATED
UPDATE — Navajo Nation Judicial Branch press release:
NN Judicial Branch Press Release
And a clean copy of the Navajo Nation Supreme Court decision:
Here are the materials so far in Begay v. Begay (D. Ariz.):
An excerpt:
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief arising out of a Navajo Supreme Court decision that violates due process and vitiates a federally issued and approved corporate charter providing for shareholder governance of a corporation formed under federal law.
3-1 Exhibits [NNSC Opinion in Navajo Nation Oil & Gas Company v. Window Rock District Court begins at page 139]
Tenth Circuit Rejects Uinta Allottees Petition for Section 17 Corporate Charter
Here are the materials in Gardner v. Jewell:
Blue Lake Rancheria Business Entity Sued by Washington Insurance Commissioner
Here is the complaint in Kriedler v. Mainstay Business Solutions (W.D. Wash.):
An excerpt: Continue reading
Sixth Circuit to Decide Tribal Enterprise Immunity Case — UPDATED!
The case is Memphis Biofuels v. Chickasaw Nation Industries, being appealed to the Sixth Circuit from the Western District of Tennessee. The case involves the assertion by CNI, a Section 17 corporation, that it is entitled to sovereign immunity, and that there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction over this contract claim against it. The lower court granted CNI’s motion to dismiss and Memphis Biofuels has appealed to the Sixth Circuit.
Here are the lower court materials:
memphis-biofuels-complaint-and-exhibits
cni-motion-to-dismiss-and-exhibits
memphis-biofuels-response-to-motion-to-dismiss
memphis-biofuels-supplemental-memorandum
Sixth Circuit materials: