SCOTUS Grants OSG Motions for Divided Argument in Murphy, Cougar Den, and Sturgeon Cases

Order list here.

Justice Gorsuch appears to be recused from the Carpenter v. Murphy case.

SCOTUS Refuses to Stay New Election Rules in North Dakota Voting Rights Act Matter . . .

Despite the fact that the primary has already been held under the other rules.

Here is the order in Brakebill v. Jaeger, with the dissent by RBG and Kagan:

18A335 Brakebill v. Jaeger

Prior posts here.

Indian Law-Related Docs from the Brett Kavanaugh Document Dump

09-13-18-gwb-document-release-murkowski-sullivan.pdf

hr1166-assistance-provided-by-small-business-development-centers-to-na.pdf

These documents could be significant.

1. During his confirmation hearing when Senator Hirono asked him if he was thinking of the Rice v. Cayetano case when he sent these emails, found here.

The nominee said he couldn’t remember whether he was thinking of Rice or if Rice had anything to do with his thoughts. The 69 pages of emails and documents that are attached here may show Kavanaugh’s thinking on Indian law issues — Rice is mentioned a few times.

2. When the nominee met with Sen. Murkowski he told her (here):

“He was the first to admit that in terms of broader Indian law he hasn’t had that much opportunity in the D.C. Circuit court to really engage on these issues, so this is not a body of law that he is often exposed to,” she said. “And he was very direct with that.”

Again, the emails show the nominee’s involvement in Indian law.

3. The letter included here is related to a Tom Udall bill that was passed unanimously by the House. The bill was to provide services to NA, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians from the SBA. The letter likely was to be cleared by the nominee. The letter states the administration’s opposition to portions of the bill on constitutional grounds, relying on Rice.

Brakebill v. Jaeger SCOTUS Application for Stay

Here:

Application

Prior posts here.

No Grants, 1 CVSG from SCOTUS Long Conference

Here is today’s order list.

The Court denied cert in Lummi Tribe v. US, County of Amador v. DOI, Fort Peck v. HUD, and Makah v. Quileute.

The Court asked for the views of the Solicitor General in Poarch Band v. Wilkes.

Sturgeon v. Frost II Background Materials

Merits Briefs:

Petitioner’s Brief

States’ Amicus Brief

Respondents’ Brief

Alaska Amicus Brief

National Parks Conservation Association Amicus Brief

Law Professors’ Brief

Alaska Native Subsistence Users Amicus Brief

Reply Brief

Cert Stage Briefs:

Cert Petition

Alaska Amicus Brief in Support of Cert Petition

Federal Brief in Opposition to Cert

Cert Stage Reply

Lower court materials:

Opinion in Sturgeon v. Masica.

Alaska Brief

Enviro Groups Brief

Federal Brief

Mentasta Traditional Village et al Brief

Sturgeon Brief

Materials in Sturgeon v. Frost I:

SCOTUS Opinion

 

Herrera v. Wyoming SCOTUS Background Materials

Here are the merit stage briefs:

Petitioner

Petitioner’s Brief

17-532 tsac Indian Law Professors

Crow Tribe Amicus Brief

Eastern Shoshone Amicus Brief

Natural Resources Law Professors Brief

NCAI Brief

PACIFIC AND INLAND NORTHWEST TREATY TRIBES Brief

Public Health Scholars Brief

Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Brief

Southern Ute Indian Tribe and Ute Mountain Ute Tribe

US Merits Brief

Petitioner’s Reply Brief

Respondent

Respondents Brief

Brief amici curiae of Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

Amicus Brief of Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

States Amicus Brief Supporting Respondent

Amicus brief of Safari Club International

Amici Curiae Brief of Wyoming Stock Growers Association

Here are the cert stage briefs:

2017-10-05 Herrera Cert Petition

17-532 Amici Brief Indian Law Professors

Crow Tribe Brief

Scholars Brief

Wyoming opposition to Herrera petition

Cert Stage Reply

17-532 Herrera (ac pet) [US invitation brief]

respondent supplemental brief

petitioner supplemental brief

Udall Statement on Judge Kavanaugh

Here:

Udall: Kavanaugh’s Confirmation Hearings Reveal Deeply Troubling Views on Indian Law and Policy

WASHINGTON — Today, U.S. Senator Tom Udall, vice chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, issued the following statement expressing his deep concerns about Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s views on Indian law and policy:

“Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings have only reinforced my serious concern that his confirmation poses a real threat to bedrock federal Indian law and policy principles that have guided the high court for decades. Judge Kavanaugh has shown in his writings, opinions, and emails that he is a jurist who would call into question the basic principles of Indian law and fails to appreciate the rights of indigenous people in the United States.

“From the documents I have reviewed so far, and based on information revealed during the hearings, I am convinced that Judge Kavanaugh is no friend to Indian Country. He openly characterized federal protections for Native Hawaiians as unconstitutional, and argued that ‘any racial group with creative reasoning can qualify as an Indian tribe.’ He even questioned the constitutionality of programs dedicated specifically to Native Americans, a view that could upend decades of progress for Indian Country on everything from housing to government contracting. And considering the sheer number of documents that are still being shielded from public and Senate view, we may have only seen the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Judge Kavanaugh’s willful misunderstanding of the rights held by Native communities, including Alaska Native Villages.

“As vice chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, I support the exercise of Tribal sovereignty and work to ensure that the United States upholds its trust responsibility to Indian Tribes, Alaska Native Villages, Native Hawaiians and all Native communities throughout the country. And as a United States Senator, it is my constitutional duty to provide advice and consent for judicial nominations to the Supreme Court. I will vote no on Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the United States Supreme Court, for a variety of reasons. But Judge Kavanaugh’s dismissive, and often outright hostile, view of the federal trust relationship runs contrary to 200 years of Supreme Court precedent and deserves special attention. His confirmation risks unwinding decades of progress for all of Indian Country, from New Mexico, to Alaska and Hawaii, and would lend credibility to unfounded attacks on federal programs that serve all Native communities.

“I believe Judge Kavanaugh poses a serious threat to the rights of Native communities across this nation. I encourage my colleagues on both sides of the aisle who are committed to upholding our trust responsibilities to carefully scrutinize Judge Kavanaugh’s troubling record as they consider whether they can support his confirmation.”

The Onion: “Kavanaugh Surprised Senate Not Questioning Fact He Never Went To Law School”

Here.

Udall Requests Kavanaugh Records on Native American Issues

From the press release:

Udall Requests Kavanaugh Records on Native American Issues

Seeks all records pertaining to Kavanaugh’s involvement with Native American issues during tenure as Staff Secretary and White House Counsel

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-N.M.), vice chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, formally requested all records pertaining to Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s involvement with Native American issues during his tenure as White House Staff Secretary and as White House Counsel.

In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Udall asked Grassley to turn over all records under his control pertaining to Kavanaugh’s work on Indian Affairs issues. Udall also asked that Grassley request all records from the National Archives regarding Kavanaugh’s time as Staff Secretary and White House Counsel related to Native American matters.

“Decisions made by the Supreme Court have a significant impact on nearly all aspects of the everyday lives of Native Americans,” Udall wrote. “In the past few years alone, the Supreme Court has ruled on cases that further defined the contours of the United States’ government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes, including: the extent to which an Indian Tribe’s treaty with the United States protects its subsistence practices from state intrusion; the scope of an Indian Tribe’s sovereign immunity; and the scope and extent of a Tribal member’s parental rights over a Native American child.”

“The Supreme Court’s influence is particularly acute in Indian Country, given the United States’ treaty and trust responsibility,” Udall continued. “So that members of this Committee—and the entire Senate—may adequately consider Judge Kavanaugh’s views on Indian Affairs issues, I respectfully request that you make available to me and my staff all records that pertain to Judge Kavanaugh’s involvement with Native American affairs while serving at the White House as Staff Secretary and as White House Counsel.”

The full text of the letter is available here.