NLRB Reply to Saginaw Chippewa Response to Motion to Remand

Here:

NLRB Reply in Support of Motion to Remand

Complete briefing here:

NLRB Motion to Remand

Sag Chip Motion to Hold Appeal in Abeyance

Sag Chip Opposition to NLRB Motion

Szotkowski Declaration

 

Sixth Circuit Orders NLRB to Reply to Little River Objections to Motion to Vacate and Remand

Here:

2014-07-28 Order Requiring NLRB Reply

LRB’s opposition is here.

Tenth Circuit Sends Chickasaw/NLRB Matter Back to Board in Light of Noel Canning

Here:

CA10 mandate

CA10 Order

We posted the NLRB’s motion here. We posted the tribe’s response here.

Michigan’s Response to Sault Tribe Renewed Motion to Dismiss

Here are updated materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):

53-1 Michigan Motion to Revise DCT Order Dismissing Tribal Officials

55 Michigan Response to Motion to Dismiss

Sault Tribe’s motion is here.

Little River Band Response to NLRB Motion to Remand

Here:

2014-07-17 LRBOI Opposition to NLRB Motion to Vacate and Remand with Exhibits A-G (2)

NLRB’s motion is here.

Saginaw Chippewa and Chickasaw Respond to NLRB’s Noel Canning-Related Motions

Here:

Chickasaw Response

Sag Chip Motion to Hold Appeal in Abeyance

Sag Chip Opposition to NLRB Motion

Szotkowski Declaration

NLRB motions here.

ICT Op/Ed on Hobby Lobby

Winter King published “Could the Hobby Lobby Ruling Have Saved the San Francisco Peaks?”

Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/07/15/could-hobby-lobby-ruling-have-saved-san-francisco-peaks

Tenth Circuit Supplemental Briefs in Oklahoma v. Hobia re: Bay Mills Decision

Here:

Oklahoma Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills

Tribal Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills

The Tenth Circuit previously abated this matter pending the outcome in Michigan v. Bay Mills.

NLRB Moves to Remand Saginaw Chippewa/Chickasaw/LRB Appeals in Light of Noel Canning Decision

Here:

Chickasaw v. NLRB

NLRB Motion to Remand

CA10 Order Directing Tribe to Respond

Saginaw Chippewa v. NLRB

NLRB Motion to Remand

Little River v. NLRB

NLRB Motion to Remand

Be mindful that oral argument in the Little River Band matter occurred in October 2013.

The Noel Canning decision is here.

 

Angela Riley: “Native American Lands and the Supreme Court”

Angela Riley has posted her very impressive paper, “Native American Lands and the Supreme Court,” published in the Journal of Supreme Court History, on SSRN.

Here is the abstract:

The Supreme Court has been instrumental in defining legal rights and obligations pertaining to Indian lands since its first path-making decision in the field in Johnson v. McIntosh in 1823. But the groundwork for the Court’s contemplation of such cases predates Supreme Court jurisprudence, and it in fact predates the formation of the Court and the United States itself.

When Europeans first made contact with this continent, they encountered hundreds of indigenous, sovereign nations representing enormous diversity in terms of language, culture, religion, and governance. For those indigenous groups — as is a common attribute of indignity of similarly situated indigenous groups around the world — this land was and is holy land. Indigenous creation stories root Indian people in this continent — Turtle Island to many — as the focal point of life, creation, religion, culture, and language. In the settlement of the country, the colonial powers initially — and the United States subsequently — treated with Indian nations to negotiate the transfer of lands from Indians to Europeans, often in exchange for peace or protection.

Prof. Riley had previously presented this paper to the Supreme Court historical society, which was televised on C-SPAN.