Here.
Materials here.
Washington Supreme Court
Washington SCt Briefs in State v. Clark — Authority of State Law Enforcement on Indian Trust Land
Here are the briefs in State v. Clark:
- Amicus of Colville Confederated Tribes
- Amicus Tulalip Tribes
- ALCU amicus brief
- Appellant Brief
- Appellant’s Answer to WAPA Amicus
- Petition for Review
- Petitioner’s Supplemental Brief
- Respondent’s Brief
- Respondent’s Supplemental Brief
- State’s Response to ACLU and Cct Amicus Briefs
- WAPA Amicus
Lower court materials here.
Washington Bar Journal Article on AUTO v. State (Challenge to Tribal Tax Agreements)
Page 24 of this PDF.
Update in State of Washington v. Clark — Tribal Amicus Filings
Here:
Colville Amicus Brief in Support of Petition for Review
Tulalip Amicus Brief in Support of Petition for Review
The parties’ briefs at the COA are here.
Washington SCT Grants Review in Case Involving State Search Warrant on Tribal Lands
Here is the order:
The case is State v. Clark, and the briefs are here.
Split Washington SCT Holds Tribes are Not Indispensable to Private Challenge to State-Tribal Tax Compacts
Here is the majority:
And the dissent:
And links to all the briefs:
85661-3 – Automotive United Trades Organization v. State of Washington et al.
Hearing Date – 01/12/2012
- Amici of a G C W, Et Al
- Amicus of a W B
- Amicus of Nfib, Et Al
- Amicus of W O M a
- Amicus of W P C
- Appellant Brief
- Auto’s Answer to Amici of Nfib, Et Al
- Reply
- Respondent Brief
- Respondent’s Answer to Amici Briefs
- Motion to Expand Record
- Reply in Support of Motion to Expand Record
- Response to Motion to Expand Record
- Statement of Additional Auth
Washington SCT Holds that State Has No Jurisdiction over Off-Rez
Washington SCT Decides Five Corners Family Farmers v. State — Groundwater Allocation Case
Here is the majority and here is the dissent.
Here is the tribal amicus brief.
Washington Supreme Court Finds State Has Jurisdiction in Washington v. Comenout
Previous materials here.
Opinion here.
ALEXANDER, J.—The primary issue presented by this case is whether the State of Washington has jurisdiction over members of Indian tribes who sell unstamped cigarettes without a license at a store that is located on trust allotment land that is outside the boundaries of an Indian reservation. We conclude that the State does possess jurisdiction in such cases, and, thus, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion of the defendants herein to dismiss the charges against them.
Anthony Broadman on AUTO v. Washington
Here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.