Ute Tribe Sues Farm over Water Rights

Here is the complaint in Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. McKee (D. Utah):

New Student Scholarship on Tribal Citizenship and Blood Quantum

Ashleigh Lussenden has published a Note, “Blood Quantum and the Ever-Tightening Chokehold on Tribal Citizenship: The Reproductive Justice Implications of Blood Quantum Requirements,” in the California Law Review. PDF

The abstract:

Blood often serves as the basis for identity for many groups in the United States. Native Americans, however, are the only population in which blood is a requirement for collective belonging and can be the determining factor for whether one receives tribal benefits and services. Many Tribal Nations use blood quantum, the percentage of Indian blood one has, as a bright-line rule to determine qualification for tribal membership. Initially established as a colonial tool of dispossession and assimilation, tribes adopted blood quantum to ensure the preservation of culture and community.

This Article contends that tribal adoption of blood quantum limits tribal members’ reproductive autonomy and violates the tenets of reproductive justice. Forcing tribal members to consider the blood quantum of their future children limits individual choice of partner and the manner in which tribal members choose to build their families. This limitation of autonomy and violation of reproductive justice principles is especially stark when analyzed in combination with contemporary pressures on Native conception and parenting, including urban migration, dysgenic environmental impacts on fertility, sexual violence, and inadequate, underfunded, and abusive reproductive healthcare. Collectively, these pressures decrease fertility, the number of available partners, and the ability for Native people to conceive and parent within their own communities.

By applying the principles of reproductive justice, Tribal Nations may begin to reassess what belonging means in Native communities and how tribal membership policies can support reproductive autonomy. The current rise of nation-building and concentrated push for self-determination in Native communities provides a unique opportunity to interrogate the priorities of tribal membership requirements and reimagine inclusion and collective belonging in Native Nations.

D.C. Circuit Rejects Federal Recognition of “Pilchuk Nation”

Here are the materials in Kanam v. Bureau of Indian Affairs:

Order

Kanam Opening Brief

Answer Brief

Reply

Ninth Circuit Denies Attorney Fees to Chicken Ranch

Here is the opinion in Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California v. State of California.

Briefs here.

Oral Argument in LDF v. Coughlin

Audio here.

Transcript here.

D.C. Circuit Allows North Dakota to Intervene in Missouri Riverbed Suit between MHA Nation and Interior Dept.

Here are the materials in MHA Nation v. Dept. of the Interior:

Opinion

Montana SCT Briefs in Monroe v. Boggs [Blackfeet Tribal Court Child Custody Matter]

Here:

California Prevails over Alturas Rancheria in IGRA Good Faith Negotiations Suit

Here are the materials in Alturas Indian Rancheria v. Newsom (E.D. Cal.):

Prior post with complaint here.

SCOTUSBlog Preview of LDF v. Coughlin

Here.

U.S. Senators’ Letter to UC-Berkeley re NAGPRA Non-Compliance

Here.

ProPublica background reporting here.