Here are the materials in State of Kansas v. Bernhardt (D. Kan.):
Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Court Dismisses Navajo Suit against Interior over Easement on Hopi Trust Land
Here are the materials in Navajo Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Ariz.):
Trevor Reed on Fair Use and Cultural Appropriation of Indigenous IP
Trevor Reed has posted “Fair Use as Cultural Appropriation,” forthcoming in the California Law Review, on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
Over the last four decades, scholars from diverse disciplines have documented a wide variety of cultural appropriations from Indigenous peoples and the harms these inflict. And yet, there are currently no federal laws other than copyright that limit the appropriation of song, dance, oral history, and other forms of intangible culture. Copyright is admittedly an imperfect fit for combatting cultural appropriations ā it is a porous form of protection, allowing some publicly beneficial uses of protected worksĀ without the consent of the copyright owner under certain exceptions, foremost being copyrightās fair use doctrine. This article evaluates fair use as a gate-keeping mechanism for unauthorized uses of culture. As codified in the 1976 Copyright Revision Act, the fair use doctrineās four-part test is supposed to help fact finders determine whether an unauthorized use of anotherās work is reasonable in light of copyrightās goals of promotingĀ cultural production. But, while the fair use test has evolved to address questions about the purpose behind an appropriation, the amount and substance of the work used, and the effects of the appropriation on the market for the work, the vital inquiry about the ānatureā of the original work and the impact of unauthorized appropriation on its creative environment has been all but forgotten by lower federal courts. Combining doctrinal analysis, settler-colonial theory, and ethnographic fieldwork involving ongoing appropriations of copyrightable Indigenous culture, this article shows how this āforgotten factorā in the fair use analysis is key to assessing the real impacts unauthorized appropriations have on culturally diverse forms of creativity. Thus, if we are committed to the development of creativity in all of its varieties and natures, a rehabilitation of the forgotten factor is both urgent and necessary.
Looks like important reading to me.
Bay Mills Indian Community & State of Michigan Reach Settlement on Vanderbilt Casino
Here is a news article summarizing the settlement.
The last decision in this long-running dispute is here.
Additional Collateral Challenge to Guidiville Rancheria Casino Rejected
Here are the new materials in Sprawldef v. City of Richmond (N.D. Cal.):
134 Motion for Judgment on Pleadings
Prior post in this case here.
Materials in Law Firm Dispute over Nisqually Representation and Privileged Document
Here are the materials in Galanda Broadman PLLC v. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP (Wash. Super. Ct.):
Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for Protective Order
Reply in Support of Motion for Protective Order
Surreply in Opposition to Motion for Protective Order
Surreply to Surreply on Motion for Protective Order
Order on Motion for Protective Order
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
Crosscut: āNative history is WA history, and tribes are helping schools teach itā
U-M Ford School Talk with Riyaz Kanji and Bryan Newland — Dec. 1, 2020
SCOTUS Grants U.S. v. Cooley
Here is the order list for today.
Here are the cert stage briefs.
Here are the lower court materials.
Jonodev Chaudhuri on McGirt in the Harvard Law Review
Jonodev Chaudhuri has published “Reflection onĀ McGirt v. Oklahoma” in the Harvard Law Review Forum.

You must be logged in to post a comment.