Here is the pleading in Estate of Cobell v. Jewell (D. D.C.):
2015-12-18 4163 Plaintiffs_ Report to the Court Regarding the Status of Historical Accounting and
Here is the pleading in Estate of Cobell v. Jewell (D. D.C.):
2015-12-18 4163 Plaintiffs_ Report to the Court Regarding the Status of Historical Accounting and
Here are the briefs in State of Alaska v. Akiachak Native Community:
2015-08-24 AK appeal brief vs Akiachak
Here are the materials in Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Gerlach (D. S.D.);:
38 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
50 Flandreau Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
51 Opposition to Flandreau Motion
We posted the complaint here.
Very interesting essay, frankly acknowledging the limitations of both the Constitution to govern and the Supreme Court to decide matters involving Indian country.
From the Atlantic, here is “Can the Constitution Govern America’s Sprawling Empire?”
Here are the materials in State of Kansas ex rel. Schmidt v. National Indian Gaming Commission (D. Kan.):
Here is the pleading from Belmont v. Roberts (Nooksack Tribal Court):
Here is the amended order in Pauma Band of Luiseño Indians v. State of California.
En banc petitions here:
Here is the petition in Crow Allottees v. Dept. of Justice:
Question presented:
Can the water rights owned by individual Crow Indian allottees – which this Court in United States v. Powers, 305 U.S. 527 (1939) recognized as distinct individual rights, separate from water rights possessed by the Crow Tribe – be awarded to the Crow Tribe in negotiations between the United States, the tribe, and the State of Montana?Further, do the Montana Courts have jurisdiction to decide these questions of federal law related to allottees’ rights?
Here is the opinion in In re D.C.:
You must be logged in to post a comment.