Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

Questions presented:

1. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the Yakama Treaty must include express exemptive language” to create an exemption from a federal tax or fee.

2. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the federal tobacco excise tax, 26 U.S.C. § 5701-5703, and the Fair and Equitable Tobacco Reform Act (“FETRA”), 7 U.S.C. § 518-519, apply to the Yakama Indians even though (1) the Yakama Treaty creates a right to travel in order to protect the Yakama Indians’ ability to trade and (2) these taxes and fees are triggered by the transport of goods – rather than by sale or manufacture.

Lower court materials here. Case tag here.

Update:

us-brief-in-opposition.pdf

Mitchell v. Tulalip Tribes Cert Petition

January 30, 2019May 8, 2019Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

mitchell-cert-petition.pdf

UPDATE:

Tulalip BIO

Question presented:

Does sovereign immunity bar the federal courts’ consideration of a declaratory judgment action to determine whether Respondent Tribes can exercise regulatory/taxing authority over real property owned in fee by Petitioners non-Indians, pursuant to allotments that were authorized by the Tribes’ treaty with the United States?

Lower court materials here.

2019 Spokane County Bar Indian Law Section Annual Conference Agenda

January 29, 2019January 30, 2019Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

2019-01-29-scba-ils-cle-agenda.pdf

Ninth Circuit Rejects Tribe’s Effort to Avoid Possessory Interest Tax (again)

January 29, 2019Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the unpublished opinion in Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Riverside County. An excerpt:

In Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians v. County of Riverside, 442 F.2d 1184 (9th Cir. 1971), we held that this very tax is permissible. Plaintiff argues that our cursory preemption analysis there is clearly irreconcilable with White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980), and therefore not controlling. See Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 893 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (permitting a three-judge panel to depart from circuit precedent if, but only if, that precedent is clearly irreconcilable with a later Supreme Court or en banc decision). We disagree.

Materials are here.

NYTs: “‘The Nation Has Stood Up’: Indigenous Clans in Canada Battle Pipeline Project”

January 28, 2019Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here.

New Issue of International Human Rights journal

January 28, 2019Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

iur_254

Features articles about Canadian Indian labor issues and a paper by Kaighn Smith and Joel Williams: “Native Americans, Tribal Sovereignty and Unions.”