Here is the opinion in United States v. Harrington.
Ninth Circuit Affirms Sentence Enhancement for Indian Country DV Conviction
Here is the opinion in United States v. Harrington.
Here is the opinion in United States v. Harrington.
Here is “Data from millions of traffic stops reveal there is ‘driving while Indian'”
Here is the unpublished opinion in State v. Northrup:
Here is the opinion in State v. Bellcourt:
Here are the cert stage materials in McGirt v. Oklahoma:
oklahoma-brief-in-opposition.pdf
Friday’s order list here.
Here is “THE CRISIS OF MURDERED AND MISSING INDIGENOUS WOMEN AND WHY TRIBES NEED THE POWER TO ADDRESS IT.”
Here is the opinion in State v. Leal (Ariz. Ct. App.):
An excerpt:
Defendant Carlos Leal appeals a restitution order requiring him to pay $5,500 in funeral expenses for a man he shot and killed in a bar. Leal does not challenge his murder conviction or resulting prison sentence. He does not argue the funeral expenses were unreasonable or unpaid. Instead, because the restitution award went to the Quechan Indian Tribe, rather than to a member of the victim’s family, Leal argues the order was fundamental error. Because Leal has shown no error, the restitution order is affirmed.
Here:
Here are the materials in (D.N.M.):
And here are the materials in (D.N.M.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.