Greg Smith on the STOP Act

Gregory D. Smith has published “The STOP Act Must Yield the Right-of-Way to Grandma’s Antique Dream Catcher: A Call to Congress” in the Journal of Global Rights and Organizations and Impunity Watch News. Here is the PDF:

Ninth Circuit Rejects Full En Banc Petition in Oak Flat Case

Here is the amended opinion and the order denying en banc review before the full court.

Panel decision and briefs here.

Ka’ila Ferrell Smith

Elena Baylis on NAGPRA and Looted Cultural Objects

Elena A. Baylis has posted “Looted Cultural Objects,” forthcoming in the Columbia Law Review Forum, on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

In the United States, Europe, and elsewhere, museums are in possession of cultural objects that were unethically taken from their countries and communities of origin under the auspices of colonialism. For many years, the art world considered such holdings unexceptional. Now, a longstanding movement to decolonize museums is gaining momentum, and some museums are reconsidering their collections. Presently, whether to return such looted foreign cultural objects is typically a voluntary choice for individual museums to make, not a legal obligation. Modern treaties and statutes protecting cultural property apply only prospectively, to items stolen or illegally exported after their effective dates. But while the United States does not have a law concerning looted foreign cultural objects, it does have a statute governing the repatriation of Native American cultural items and human remains. The Native American Graves Protection and Restoration Act requires museums to return designated Native American cultural objects to their communities – even if they were obtained before the law went into effect. This statute offers a valuable model for repatriating foreign cultural objects that were taken from formerly colonized peoples.

Arizona Federal Court Declines to Enjoin Power Line

Here are the materials in Tohono O’Odham Nation v. Department of the Interior (D. Ariz.):

16 Motion for Injunction

27 SunZia Response

30 Federal Response

43 Reply

56 DCt Order

Prior post here.

Wisconsin Federal Court Allows Race Discrimination Claim against Bank to Proceed on behalf of Native American Church Practitioners

Here are the materials so far in Mashkikii Boodawaaning (Medicine Fireplace) Inc. v. Chippewa Valley Agency Ltd. (W.D. Wis.):

Tribal Nations Amicus Brief in Montana Environmental Case

Here is the brief in Held v. State of Montana:

New Student Scholarship on Tribal Trademark Law

Anthony Hernandez has published “Tribal Trademark Law” in the Stanford Law Review. Here is the abstract:

Native American tribes are increasingly creating their own intellectual and cultural property statutes. Of all the new legislation, tribal trademark law in particular is an engaging yet understudied area. By studying tribal trademark law, it becomes possible to evaluate the nature and scope of tribal sovereignty. And studying tribal trademark law provides an opportunity to consider how federal trademark law might incorporate tribal innovations. Situated at the intersection of tribal law, intellectual property, and tribal sovereignty, this Note asks whether the federal government is prepared to incorporate and recognize tribal trademark law in the same way that it has done for states’ laws.

San Carlos Apache Tribe Submission re: Oak Flat to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

Here:

Miami Tribe Sues Auction House to Recover Chief Little Turtle’s Peace Medal from 1795 Treaty of Greenville Negotiations

Here is the complaint in Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. Stack’s-Bowers Numismatics (Cal. Super.):

The Bad Old Days of the Smithsonian

From the NAES newsletter, “NAES Rule,” Nov. 1986: