Here are the new pleadings in Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. United States Department of the Army (E.D.Va.):

Here are the materials in Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Bhatt (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.

Here are materials in Quechan Indian Tribe v. United States (S.D. Cal.):
Doc 404 Findings Conclusion and Order
Prior post here.

Here are the new pleadings in Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. United States Department of the Army (E.D.Va.):

Gregory D. Smith has published “The STOP Act Must Yield the Right-of-Way to Grandma’s Antique Dream Catcher: A Call to Congress” in the Journal of Global Rights and Organizations and Impunity Watch News. Here is the PDF:
Here is the amended opinion and the order denying en banc review before the full court.
Panel decision and briefs here.

Elena A. Baylis has posted “Looted Cultural Objects,” forthcoming in the Columbia Law Review Forum, on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
In the United States, Europe, and elsewhere, museums are in possession of cultural objects that were unethically taken from their countries and communities of origin under the auspices of colonialism. For many years, the art world considered such holdings unexceptional. Now, a longstanding movement to decolonize museums is gaining momentum, and some museums are reconsidering their collections. Presently, whether to return such looted foreign cultural objects is typically a voluntary choice for individual museums to make, not a legal obligation. Modern treaties and statutes protecting cultural property apply only prospectively, to items stolen or illegally exported after their effective dates. But while the United States does not have a law concerning looted foreign cultural objects, it does have a statute governing the repatriation of Native American cultural items and human remains. The Native American Graves Protection and Restoration Act requires museums to return designated Native American cultural objects to their communities – even if they were obtained before the law went into effect. This statute offers a valuable model for repatriating foreign cultural objects that were taken from formerly colonized peoples.

Here are the materials in Tohono O’Odham Nation v. Department of the Interior (D. Ariz.):
Prior post here.

Here are the materials so far in Mashkikii Boodawaaning (Medicine Fireplace) Inc. v. Chippewa Valley Agency Ltd. (W.D. Wis.):

You must be logged in to post a comment.