Here are the materials in Holtz v. Oneida Airport Hotel Corp. (E.D. Wis.):
economic development
Materials in Modoc Nation Suit against Former Business Partner, Softek
Here are the materials (so far) in Modoc Nation v. Shah (N.D. Okla.):
75 Motion to Dismiss Complaint
77 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
82 Second Amended Counterclaims
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Issues Three Decisions in Disputes between Microsoft and St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
HCN: “Casino closures in Indian Country hit core tribal services”
Here.
An excerpt:
When Bryan Newland was 16, he got a job as a dishwasher at his tribe’s casino restaurant. In college, he carried golf bags for patrons at the casino course. Now the chairman of Bay Mills Indian Community, Newland was forced to announce on Wednesday that the tribal government could no longer pay the 400 people employed at Bay Mills casinos, golf courses, and other tribal businesses and departments closed due to COVID-19.
“I understand that many of you are angry, frustrated and scared,” Newland (Ojibwe) told tribal members in a Facebook video address on Wednesday. “You’re not alone in those feelings. The Small Business Administration has abandoned us, and it is failing Indian Country right now.”
News Coverage of $10B Indian Country Stimulus
Here, from Underscore.
Sixth Circuit Briefs in Sovereign Lending Case Involving Chippewa Cree Tribe
Here are the briefs in Swiger v. Rosette:
Lower court materials in Swiger v. Rosette (E.D. Mich.):
Havasupai Nation Suspends Tourism over COVID 19
Federal Court Holds Hualapai Business Immune From Suit
Here are the materials in Zhang v. Grand Canyon Resort Corp. (C.D. Cal.):
Arizona SCT Holds Tribal Company Did Not Establish Status as Subordinate Entity and Was Not Entitled to Immunity
Here is the opinion in Hwal’Bay Ba J Enterprises v. Jantzen:
hwalbay-v.-jantzen-ariz-2020.pdf
An excerpt:
An Indian tribe’s “subordinate economic organization” serves as an “arm of the tribe” and therefore shares its sovereign immunity. This tort case affords us an opportunity to identify factors courts should examine to decide whether a tribal entity serves in that capacity. After doing so, we conclude the tribal entity here did not prove it is a subordinate economic organization entitled to share the tribe’s immunity, and the superior court therefore did not err by denying the entity’s motion to dismiss.
Briefs are here.
Federal Court Certifies Tribal Lending Case for Interlocutory Appeal
Here are materials in Hengle v. Asner (E.D. Va.):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.