Here is the opinion.
Briefs here.
Here is the petition:
Update:
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Secretary of the Interior exceeded his statutory authority by taking land located within the reservation boundaries of one Indian Tribe and placing the land in trust for another Tribe, despite the objections of the first Tribe and in violation of a regulatory prohibition and the United States’ treaty promises to the first Tribe.
2. Whether the Court should hold this petition pending its disposition of Maine Community Health Options v. United States, No. 18-1023 (argued Dec. 10, 2019), because this case raises the same issue concerning implied repeals effected by appropriations laws and the proper standard for determining what law to apply.
Lower court materials here.
Here is the complaint in Navajo Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Ariz.):
Here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
Materials here.
Here is the opinion in Cherokee Nation v. Bernhardt.
Briefs:
cherokee-nation-answer-brief.pdf
lower court materials here.
UPDATE:
Here are the additional materials in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (D. Mass.):
207 Tribe Motion to Stay Judgment
Prior post here.
Here is the opinion in State of South Dakota v. Great Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs (IBIA).
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
57 Motion to Supplement Record
62 DCT Order Denying Motion to Supplement Record
80 DCT Order Denying Second Motion
91 Stand Up Motion for Summary Judgmen
Prior post here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.