John Shagonaby in the Allegan News re: Gun Lake Casino

From the Allegan News:

To the editor: In response to Kathy Cassady’s letter—“Think tribal ancestors wanted casino?” No, our ancestors simply wanted to retain our land, culture and sovereignty.

Upon learning that the U.S. Court of Appeals decided in yet another court case that the Gun Lake tribe has the right to build a casino, Chairman D.K. Sprague thanked the Creator because our families have suffered economically and socially for centuries; ever since we lost all the land everyone else currently enjoys, including Kathy Cassady.

Continue reading

Mullally v. Havasu Landing Casino — FLMA Claim Against Tribal Casino

The district court for the Central District of California dismissed the FMLA claim on grounds of sovereign immunity. Other claims, including defamation, were dismissed without prejudice on the tribal court exhaustion doctrine. And, under tribal law, the casino immunity was waived.

havasu-landing-motion-to-dismiss

mullally-opposition-to-motion

mullally-opposition-to-motion-part-2

havasu-landing-reply-brief

mullally-v-havasu-landing-casino-dct-order

State of Alabama v. United States — Challenge to Class III Procedures

Following Texas’s successful challenge to the Class III procedures in the Fifth Circuit, Alabama is doing the same in the S.D. Ala. (part of the old 5th Circuit, now the 11th Circuit). This case involves the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.

alabama-complaint

alabama-motion-for-preliminary-injunction

us-motion-to-dismiss-alabama-complaint

poarch-band-motion-to-dismiss-alabama-complaint

Saginaw Chippewa Employee Gas Discount

From the Mt. Pleasant Morning Sun:

Tribal Council for the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe is offering Tribal employees a 10 cent per gallon discount.

More than 4,200 employees were notified Friday of the discount available at both Sagamok and Saganing Sagamok convenience store gas stations.

“I think (Tribal) council is aware of the tough economic times our employees are going through,” Tribal Chief Fred Cantu said. “And we know that there are people who work here that drive from as far away as Lansing and Saginaw.

“I think council felt their employees should share in the discount we offer to our (Tribal) members because we feel that our employees are like family to us.”

Better hope this isn’t taxable income….

DOI/BIA Sends Final Section 20 Regulations for Publication in the Federal Register

From Indianz:

In one of his final actions as head of the Bureau of Indian Affairs assistant secretary Carl Artman has finalized the long-awaited Section 20 regulations for gaming on trust land acquired after 1988. The regulations were sent for publication in the Federal Register. They are due to appear tomorrow and will be considered final and effective in 30 days.

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act bars gaming on lands acquired after 1988. But Section 20 of the law sets out four exceptions: for Oklahoma tribes with former reservations, newly recognized tribes, newly restored tribes and tribes with land claims.

If a tribe can’t meet any of the exceptions, it can still pursue gaming so long as the state governor concurs. This is known as the two-part determination process.

The rules set out criteria for all four of the exceptions, plus the two-part determination process.

bia-section-20-final-regulations

Ho-Chunk Nation v. Wisconsin Cert Petition

Ho-Chunk Nation has filed a cert petition in its dispute over revenue sharing with the State of Wisconsin.

Here is the petition — hcn-cert-petition

Here is the docket site — No. 07-1402.

Here are the rest of the materials — CA7 opinion and some briefsrest of the materials.

Kickapoo v. Texas on Petitions to Watch List

SCOTUSBlog isn’t taking any chances with Indian law now. 🙂

The Kickapoo v. Texas petition is on its watch list for the May 29, 2008 conference (here).

Docket: 07-1109
Case name: Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas v. Texas, et al.
Issue: Whether, following Seminole Tribe v. Florida (1996), the Secretary of the Interior may establish procedures for Indian gaming if a state declines to enter a compact with the Tribe and invokes immunity from suit under the 11th Amendment.

Financial Pressure on Sault Tribe re: Greektown

From Indianz:

The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians is facing pressure to make sure its commercial casino in Detroit complies with state law.

The tribe has fallen behind on construction of a permanent Greektown Casino. Revenues have dropped and the facility’s debt-to-earnings ratio isn’t meeting state requirements. In hopes of resolving the issue, the tribe last week announced that it landed a $100 million investment. The tribe would retain 60 percent ownership of the casino. But the Michigan Gaming Control Board is questioning whether the deal will resolve the tribe’s financial concerns. The board gave the tribe until June 10 to defend its future.

Get the Story:
Greektown Casino financing questioned (The Detroit News 5/14)

Impact of Michigan’s Smoking Ban on Indian Casinos

From the AP:

DETROIT (AP) — If smoking is banned in Detroit bars, restaurants and workplaces, Betty Gilbert says it will hurt the city’s casinos.

Gilbert, who was smoking a cigarette Friday with members of her bowling team on a sidewalk near Greektown Casino downtown, should know. The 69-year-old from Cape May County, N.J. — who said she usually gambles weekly in Atlantic City — plans to cut back when that city’s smoking law goes into effect.

“If they cut out the smoking, they should also cut out the drinking,” Gilbert said.

A ban passed by the Michigan Senate on Thursday now heads to the House, which passed a narrower bill five months ago. If the new bill becomes law, smokers could pass up the trip downtown to gamble and head instead to Indian casinos, which aren’t affected, industry observers said.

Continue reading

ICT Editorial on Fee to Trust Statute

From ICT:

The federal government’s recent actions involving its authority to make decisions on acquiring land in trust for tribal gaming purposes may inadvertently threaten the authority and duty of the secretary of the Interior Department to take land into trust for Indian tribes.

On April 29, the D.C. Circuit decided an innocuous case involving the secretary of Interior’s decision to take land into trust for the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians (also known as the Gun Lake Band). It was the third such opinion in recent years involving Michigan Potawatomi Indian tribes, each brought by well-funded citizens groups opposing Indian gaming. The suits were mere harassment suits, intended to delay rather than prevent the opening of the Potawatomi gaming operations. Each of the suits brought similar claims.

Of import, one claim was that Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act, the statute that authorizes the secretary to take land into trust for Indian tribes, was an unconstitutional delegation of congressional authority. The first two D.C. Circuit panel decisions (2006 and 2007), involving the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians and the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians, rejected the constitutional challenge to Section 5 without much discussion or dissent. In fact, since 1995, at least three other federal appellate circuits have rejected the same kind of challenge to the statute, so this is unsurprising.

Continue reading