D.C. Federal Court Vacates Trump Administration Recission of Gaming Lands Opinion re: Scotts Valley

Here are the new materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):

92 Second Amended Complaint

96-1 Scotts Valley MSJ

98 GTL Properties Amicus Brief

99-1 Federal MSJ

107 United Auburn Community Amicus Brief

108 Dehe Wintun Tribes Amicus Brief

109 Cal Indian Gaming Commission Amicus Brief

110 Lytton Rancheria Amicus Brief

111 Scotts Valley Reply

112 Federal Reply

115 DCT Order

Prior post here.

not the right tribes, I know.

California Superior Court Order Dismissing Tribal Suit against Cardrooms

Here is the order in Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Parkwest Bicycle Casino:

Abs and Schnoz.

Amended Complaint in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgum

Here:

Prior post here.

D.C. Federal Court Transfers Eklutna Gaming Case to Alaska Federal Court

Here are the new materials in State of Alaska v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

16 Tribe Motion to Transfer

25 Alaska Opposition

26 Reply

33 DCT Order

Complaint here.

So ready for Young Guns III.

D.C. Federal Court Refuses to Enjoin Interior’s Reversal of Scotts Valley Decision

Here are the new materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):

3-1 Motion for Injunction

47 Opposition

57 United Auburn Community Amicus Brief

58 Lytton Rancheria Amicus Brief

63 Reply

75 GTL Properties Amicus Brief

76 COLT Amicus Brief

83 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Maverick Gaming LLP v. United States Cert Petition

Here:

Questions presented:

Whether Rule 19 requires dismissal of APA suits challenging federal agency action whenever a nonparty who benefited from that action asserts sovereign immunity.

Lower court materials here.

California Sues Interior over Koi Nation Trust Land Acquisition

Here is the complaint in State of California v. Dept. of the Interior (N.D. Cal.):

SCOTUS Denies Cert in Sault Tribe Trust Acquisition Case

Here is today’s order list.

Cert stage briefs here.

D.C. Federal Court Denies Intervention in Scotts Valley Gaming Case

Here are the intervention materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):

12 First Amended Complaint

15 UAC Motion to Intervene

16-1 Wintun Tribes Motion to Intervene

20-1 GTL Motion to Intervene

29 Federal Opposition to Tribal Motions

30 Federal Opposition to 20

31 Scotts Valley Combined Opposition

34 GTL Reply

35 UAC Reply

36 Wintun Tribes Reply

38 DCT Order on Intervention

Prior post here.

Scotts Valley Sues Interior over Gaming Approval Reversal

Here are the materials so far in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):