Here:
sovereign immunity
Update in Black v. US — Tort Claims Related to Shooting by Tribal Police
Here are the updated materials in Black v. United States (W.D. Wash.):
46 Kitsap County Motion to Dismiss
53 Joint Tribal Motion to Dismiss
62 DCT Order Dismissing Kitsap County Sheriff’s Office
Only the tribal defendants remain in the case. Prior post on this matter here.
Student Commentary on Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community
Here, in the Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar. Titled A Tradition of Sovereignty: Examining Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Bay Mills Indian Community v. Michigan, written by Meredith L. Jewitt.
Tribal Immunity Panel at Fed Bar 2014
Patrice Kunesh, Bill Wood, Elizabeth Conway, Jenn Weddle
Incidentally, Bill Wood’s paper, It Wasn’t An Accident: The Tribal Sovereign Immunity Story, is here.
Federal Court Dismisses Alabama v. PCI Gaming Authority
Here are the materials in State of Alabama v. PCI Gaming Authority (M.D. Ala.):
1 PBCI Notice of Removal + Exhibits
Federal Court Challenge to Oglala Sioux Tribal Government Dismissed
Here are the materials in Lee v. Cleve Her Many Horses (D.S.D.):
29 Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants
32 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants
34 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction
36 Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants
Caddo Nation Leadership Dispute in Federal Court
Here are the materials in Caddo Nation of Oklahoma v. Court of Indian Offenses for the Anadarko Agency (W.D. Okla.):
Federal Court Requires Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies in ICRA Habeas Claim
Here are the materials in Styliest v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe (D.S.D.):
5 DCT Order Denying Habeas Writ
The Eighth Circuit denied petitioner’s direct appeal of his federal conviction here.
Federal Court Refuses to Dismiss Suit against Alaska Assn. of Village Presidents on Immunity Grounds
Here are the materials in Eaglesun Systems Products Inc. v. Association of Village Council Presidents (N.D. Okla.):
41 DCT Order Denying Motion to Dismiss
An excerpt:
Now before the Court are the following motions: Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 22), Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Dkt. # 27), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery (Dkt. # 36). Defendant Association of Village Council Presidents (AVCP) argues that it has sovereign immunity from suit because all of its members are federally-recognized Indian tribes and AVCP was created to provide governmental services for its members. Plaintiff Eaglesun Systems Products, Inc. responds that AVCP is a non-profit corporation organized under state law, and it is not entitled to sovereign immunity as an Indian tribe or as a tribal organization. Plaintiff also requests leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery before the Court rules on defendant’s motion to dismiss.

You must be logged in to post a comment.