ABA SCOTUS Indian Law Cases Webinar (August 29, 2023)

Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2023

Time: 3:00 p.m. â€“ 4:30 p.m. ET

Format: Free non-CLE Webinar

Sponsor: ABA Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice

The United States Supreme Court decided several Indian law cases this term that touch on fundamental concepts at the core of federal Indian law.  This panel, made up, in part, of lawyers who were directly involved in each of these cases on behalf of Indian Tribes, and other lawyers and scholars who will offer a broader perspective, will discuss each of these cases and their impact on broader federal Indian law principles.

Speakers:

  • Erin C. Dougherty Lynch â€“ Senior Staff Attorney and Managing Attorney, Native American Rights Fund
  • Shay Dvoretzky â€“ Partner, Supreme Court and Appellate Litigation, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Affiliates
  • Matthew L.M. Fletcher â€“ Harry Burns Hutchins Collegiate Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School
  • Leonard R. Powell â€“ Associate, Jenner & Block
  • Pratik A. Shah â€“ Partner, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Moderator:

  • Patty Ferguson Bohnee â€“ Director, Indian Legal Clinic, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law; Attorney, Sacks Tierney


Register HERE: https://americanbar.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_lbFcLRxERZqV6JrqtYYOWw

The Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice is the only ABA membership entity solely dedicated to the advancement of human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and social justice. We invite you to become involved with critical legal and public policy issues by joining one or more Section committees. You may want to become part of a committee to learn more about developments in a particular issue area. Or you may choose to take a more active role by participating in or organizing specific activities. Whatever your area of interest or specialization, we have a home for you.  To get involved, join us here.

City of Tulsa v Hooper Stay Application Materials

Here:

Lower court materials here.

Bird v. Three Affiliated Cert Petition [sovereign immunity]

Here is the petition in Bird v. Tribal Business Council of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation:

Question presented:

Does inclusion of a mandatory arbitration clause in an Agreement with an Indian Tribe waive the Tribe’s sovereign immunity?

Eighth Circuit materials:

District court materials here.

Connecticut Public Radio Show on Brackeen and Ned Blackhawk’s New Book

Here.

Native America Calling on the Affirmative Action and Student Loans Cases

Here.

ACS Broken Law Podcast on Brackeen Featuring Wenona Singel

Here is “A Win for Tribal Sovereignty.”

Wenona Singel at the Supreme Court

5Qs for Fletcher on Haaland v. Brackeen & LDF v. Coughlin

From U of M law school, here.

An excerpt:

ICWA was always a part of my scholarly agenda, largely because ICWA is such an important part of virtually every Native person’s personal history. My writing partner and spouse Wenona Singel can trace the removals of her ancestors from the 1830s all the way to the 1970s. Our children are the first generation of children in her family to not be removed since the 1830s. I began to focus on the constitutional defense of ICWA intensely after a 2013 Supreme Court decision, Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, where the Court questioned the constitutionality of the Act. Within a couple years, constitutional challenges to ICWA were swarming the courts. Occasionally joined with Singel, who was using other media to tell her family’s story, I began to write systematically on each constitutional issue in an effort to push back on the narrative that ICWA was somehow constitutionally suspect. I focused on congressional Indian affairs powers, anti-commandeering and federal preemption, equal protection, and non-delegation.

An E.S.F. sketch of his dad.

This Land Special Brackeen Decision Episode

Here.

Opinion here.

SCOTUSBlog Recap of Arizona v. Navajo Opinion

Here.

Opinion and stuff here.

SCOTUS Rejects Navajo Nation’s Water Rights Trust Claim 5-4

Here is the opinion in Arizona v. Navajo Nation.

Background materials here.