Here is the order:
Briefs:
My favorite rule!
Here are the materials in Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
2011 Elected Council Motion to Dismiss
Death Valley Council Opposition
DCT Order Dismissing Complaint
Prior post on the PI stage of this case here.
Here is the response to the petition:
Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus
The petition is here.
Here is the petition for a writ of mandamus in the Cherokee Supreme Court:
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus 3262013
The dispute centers around a new election code, of which the parties disagree as to when the next election for Principal Chief will be — in 2013 or 2015.
Here are the materials in Anglen v. Cherokee Nation Council:
Here is the opinion in Sandoval v. Navajo Election Administration.
The court’s syllabus:
The Supreme Court issues its opinion on reconsideration in this appeal of an OHA dismissal on an election grievance. The Court reverses the OHA and orders Leo Johnson disqualified as school board member of the Shiprock Associated Schools Inc. (SASI). The Court emphasizes the duties of the NEA and candidates when conditions concerning qualifications change before an election has taken place. The Court states that the qualifications statute for school board members specifically require mandatory enforcement throughout the term of office. The vacancy shall be filled by special election pursuant to 11 N.N.C. § 143.
Here are the materials (some of them anyway) in Lewis v. White Mt. Apache Tribe (D. Ariz.):
Here.
Here are the materials in Eastern Shawnee Tribe v. Douthitt (N.D. Okla.):
DCT Order Denying CIO Motion to Dismiss
An excerpt from the opinion:
Now before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 16). Defendants argue that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case because plaintiff is asking the Court to resolve an internal tribal dispute. They also assert that they have not waived their sovereign immunity from suit and that plaintiff’s claims should be dismissed. Plaintiff responds that it is asking the Court to determine whether the Court of Indian Offenses for the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma had jurisdiction to decide an election dispute, and this is a federal question that can be decided by this Court. They also argue that defendants are not shielded from suit by the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
Here are new materials filed by the Freedmen and the feds against the Cherokee Nation:
Federal Answer to Amended Complaint
Freedmen Amended Answer — Counterclaims — Cross Claims
News coverage here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.