Here.
Steven Pevar: “The Shutdown Is Disproportionally Hurting Native Americans”
Here.
Here.
Here, featuring the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians.
Andrew Huff and Tim Coulter have released “Defending Morton v. Mancari and the Constitutionality of Legislation Supporting Indians and Tribes”.
Quote from the article
Supporting and defending the Mancari decision and the rule that it stands for – that laws benefiting tribes are not unconstitutional racial classifications – is a very high priority, perhaps the most urgent and important Indian law issue of our time. This paper reviews the decision in Mancari and the law leading up to and following it. We then turn to a discussion of the present challenges to the Mancari rule. In Part V, we suggest possible ways to support the decision and its rationale, and we discuss some additional legal arguments and approaches for defending the constitutionality of legislation benefiting tribes.
PDF of paper below and paper is available for download here
Here.
Here are the materials in Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
Here are the materials in Fort McDermitt Paiute & Shoshone Tribe v. Price (D. D.C.):
Here are the materials in the zombie case, Upper Lake Pomo Association v. Morton (E.D. Cal.) [yes, that’s Rogers Morton and yes, the caption number starts with 75]:
324-1 Diwald Motion to Intervene
332 Jackson Reply in Support of 320
Here is the opinion in LaBatte v . United States.
Briefs:
You must be logged in to post a comment.