trust relationship – Page 46

Council for Tribal Employment Rights (“Council”), a national intertribal nonprofit organization which represents the employment interests of certain Indian tribes, seeks $500,000 in damages for the alleged breach of two agreements which involved the Council, the Office of Indian Energy and Economic Development (“the Office”), a component of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“the Bureau”), U.S. Department of the Interior, and the Spirit Lake Tribe (“Spirit Lake” or “the Tribe”), a federally recognized Indian tribe. Both agreements were executed as amendments to an existing contract between the Office and Spirit Lake. The first, Amendment 2, involved the provision of funds to support a Native Construction Careers Initiative (“NCCI”) commercial construction training program, and called upon the Council to conduct the training program. The second, Amendment 6, allocated funds to support training projects approved by the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”). The statement of work for that Amendment referenced an FHWA training program agreement which contemplated that the Council would provide training to develop certain certification programs for road construction activities.

Materials in Trinity River Flow Suit

August 26, 2013Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials in San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Jewell (E.D. Cal.):

DCT Order Lifting TRO and Denying Preliminary Injunction

Water Districts Motion

Water Districts Reply

News coverage here.

Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Klamath Claims Committee v. United States

August 26, 2013Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Unpublished opinion here:

12-5130.Opinion.8-20-2013.1

Briefs here.

Lower court materials here and here.

News Coverage of Federal Government’s Intervention in Penobscot v. Maine

August 23, 2013Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here, via Pechanga.

Miccosukee Sues United States, Claiming Illegal Tax Audits and Trust Breach

August 15, 2013Matthew L.M. Fletcher1 Comment

Here is the complaint in Miccosukee Tribe v. United States (S.D. Fla.):

Miccosukee Complaint

Here is an excerpt:

1. The MICCOSUKEE TRIBE brings this suit to redress intentional and gross breaches of trust by the United States, by and through the Defendants, with respect to the money and property of the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People.

2. This suit involves willful, purposeful, and malicious actions by the United States, by and through the Defendants, by selectively targeting the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People for federal tax audits.

3. The procedures utilized to target the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People were improper, secret, and conflict ridden.

4. These procedures were conflict ridden and improper because they involved dealings with persons acting outside the established scope of employment with the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and whose legal interests were clearly and substantially adverse to the legal interests of the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People.

5. Although the United States, acting by and through the Defendants, clearly knew that the individuals they were dealing with were acting to the detriment of the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People, it allowed, encouraged, perpetrated, and protected them in order to improperly obtain tax assessments, penalties, and interest against the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People amounting to millions of dollars.

6. Although the United States, acting by and through the Defendants, clearly knew that some of the individuals they were dealing with were actively engaged in violation of the criminal laws of the United States while purporting to represent the interests of the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE, the United States allowed, encouraged, perpetrated, and protected these individuals in order to improperly obtain tax assessments, penalties, and interest against the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People amounting to millions of dollars.

7. These losses to the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People are permanent and of a continuing nature, as interest continues to accrue on the tax assessments instituted by the United States, acting by and through the Defendants.

8. As a direct and proximate cause of the intentional and wrongful actions, as well as the gross breach of trust by the United States, acting by and through the Defendants, the MICCOSUKEE TRIBE and its People have suffered irreparable harm by losing millions of dollars through the Defendants’ arbitrary and indiscriminate imposition of tax liabilities, penalties and interest.