Lawsuit Challenging the Administration’s Withdrawal of the 2016 Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS)
Here is the Complaint. Plaintiffs include California Tribal Family Coalition, Cherokee Nation, and Yurok Tribe along with a number of LGBTQ+ organizations.
Here is a link to all of our previous posts on AFCARS
Similarly, Defendants eliminated most questions related to how child welfare agencies treat children to whom ICWA applies. Although ACF had in 2016 found these questions essential to guide its allocation of resources to help AI/AN youth, Defendants abandoned them without any discussion of the value of the information being lost for AI/AN youth and the tribes seeking to protect them.
The Indian Law Clinic represents the plaintiffs in this case along with Democracy Forward and Lambda Legal.
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Kalispel Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior
Oklahoma Death Row Prisoner Granted Leave to File Habeas Petition Based on McGirt [Choctaw Reservation]
Here are the materials so far in Ryder v. Sharp (E.D. Okla.):
Attorney Statement Regarding the Execution of Lezmond Mitchell
Here:
“Today, the federal government added another chapter to its long history of injustices against Native American people. Over the steadfast objection of the Navajo Nation, and despite urgent pleas for clemency from Navajo leaders and many other Native American tribes, organizations, and citizens, the Trump Administration executed Lezmond Mitchell, a Navajo man, for a crime against other Navajo people committed on Navajo land.
“Mr. Mitchell’s execution represents a gross insult to the sovereignty of the Navajo Nation, whose leaders had personally called on the President to commute his sentence to life without possibility of release. The very fact that he faced execution despite the tribe’s opposition to a death sentence for him reflected the government’s disdain for tribal sovereignty.
“Mr. Mitchell’s execution came after the Supreme Court refused to allow him to interview his jurors – 11 white people and a single Navajo – about whether racial bias influenced their decision. Yet we have little doubt that it did, because in their zealous pursuit of a death sentence for Mr. Mitchell, the federal prosecutors made arguments laced with anti-Indian stereotypes.
“We have been honored to meet and work with members of the Navajo Nation and many other Native American people who sought to halt Lezmond Mitchell’s execution. We hope that the future will bring greater respect for the sovereignty of Indian nations and for the traditions of their people.”
-Jonathan Aminoff and Celeste Bacchi, Deputy Federal Public Defenders, attorneys for Lezmond Mitchell
-August 26, 2020
Federal Court Dismisses Lower Brule Sioux Election Challenge
Here are the materials in Goodface v. Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 2020 Election Board (D.S.D.):
Lezmond Mitchell Suit to Stay Execution Pending Results of Clemency Process
Here are the materials so far in Mitchell v. Barr (D.D.C.):
Yes!: “What Women’s Suffrage Owes to Indigenous Culture”
Here.
Minnesota COA Restores Leech Lake Ojibwe Member’s Challenge to Itasca County’s Authority to Prosecute Fireworks Sales
Here is the unpublished opinion in Irv’s Boomin’ Fireworks LLC v. Muhar:
Earlier case here.
Yakama Nation Suit against US over Timber Trust Breach
Here are the materials so far in Yakama Indian Nation v. United States (Fed. Cl.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.