Here: PM Announcement
NAICJA/NCJFJC Free Webinar on Peacemaking, April 24
Here: PM Announcement
Here: PM Announcement
Here.
Here:
Letter from the Editor
Anter, Simone
“Water is Life” Editoon
Two Bulls, Marty Sr.
Oceti Sakowin Camp
Hewitt, Cathy
Gallery I
Wilson, Rob
Environmentalism and Human Rights Legal Framework: The Continued Frontier of Indigenous Resistance
Thompson, Geneva E. B.
Gallery II
Wilson, Rob
White Man’s Elixir
Kuauhtzin, Tekpatl Tonalyohlotl
Here:
Lower court materials in Amador County v. Jewell (D.D.C.):
Here:
The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 4/14/17.
U.S. Federal Courts Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.html
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act – Tribal Governmental Power)
U.S. Regulatory Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/regulatory/2017.html
The Department of Interior has published a notice about a listening session scheduled to help improve the Land Buy-Back program for tribal nations under the Cobell settlement.
News Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html
In the Tribal Government section, we include an article about a victory for a tribe regarding jurisdiction over gaming.
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2017.html
The following articles were added:
Native nations and the Constitution: An inquiry into “extra-constitutionality.”
What the future holds: The changing landscape of federal Indian policy.
Roadway to reform: Assessing the 2015 guidelines and new federal rule to the Indian Child Welfare Act’s applications in State courts.
Capital, inequality, and self-determination: Creating a sovereign financial system for Native American nations.
Why Indigenous Peoples’ property rights matter: Why the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples may be used to condemn Isis and the State of Iraq for their failure to protect the property rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Nineveh Plains.
Defending the Cobell buy-back program.
Intellectual property rights and informed consent in American Indian communities: Legal and ethical issues.
Raising capital in Indian Country.
Christman v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde: A chapter in the disenrollment epidemic.
The dynamic legal environment of daily fantasy sports.
Trespass to culture: The bioethics of Indigenous populations’ informed consent in mainstream genetic research paradigms.
U.S. Legislation Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html
Two bills were added:
S.825: Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium Land Transfer Act of 2017.
H.R.2035: Tribal Adoption Parity Act.
Tribal Courts Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/pre2016.html
Christman v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde (Disenrollment)
Here:
Vol. 41, No. 1 (2016-2017)
Click any link to view in PDF format
Article
Comments
Defending the Cobell Buy-Back Program – Rebekah Martin
Raising Capital in Indian Country – Evan Way
Note
Christman v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde: A Chapter in the Disenrollment Epidemic – Tabitha Minke
The Dynamic Legal Environment of Daily Fantasy Sports – Elizabeth Lohah Homer
Here, by Pam Palmater. Canada’s numbers of Native children in care may be currently worse than pre-ICWA numbers in the United States (Task Force Four Report).
The increasing number of First Nations children being placed into foster care in Canada is nothing short of a crisis. Although Indigenous children make up only seven per cent of the population in Canada, they represent 48 per cent of all children in foster care. It is an astounding number until one examines these rates on a province-by-province basis. In Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, Indigenous children represent a shocking 73 per cent, 85 per cent and 87 per cent of all children in care respectively, according to the most recent Statistics Canada report. However, Manitoba reports that their numbers of Indigenous children in care are increasing and currently stands at 90 per cent, which represents one of the highest rates in the world. This isn’t much of a surprise given that one newborn is taken away from his or her mother every day in Manitoba as a matter of course—the vast majority being Indigenous. They are not the only provinces implicated as Indigenous children in Ontario are 168 per cent more likely to be taken into care than white children.
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.