
Here are the materials in Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. City of Yakima (E.D. Wash.):
Here are the materials in Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. City of Yakima (E.D. Wash.):
Here is the complaint in Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. P4 Production LLC (D. Idaho):
Here are the materials in United States v. Dow Chemical Co. (E.D. Mich.):
Here are the materials in El Paso Natural Gas Co. LLC v. United States (D. Ariz.):
Prior posts here.
Here are updated materials in In re Gold King Mine Release in San Juan, County on August 5, 2015 (D.N.M.):
166 DCt Order re EPA Contractors
167 DCT Order re Harrison Western
168 DCT Order re Sunnyside Gold
Earlier materials here.
Here is the petition in Teck Metals Ltd. v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (No. 18-1160):
Update:
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit, in conflict with Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), and RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, 136 S. Ct. 2090 (2016), correctly concluded that holding Teck liable for its discharges in Canada was not an impermissible extraterritorial application of CERCLA.
2. Whether the Ninth Circuit, in conflict with this Court’s decision in Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277 (2014), and the Second, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits, correctly held that a State may exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a defendant because the defendant knew its conduct would have in-state effects, where the defendant’s relevant conduct occurred elsewhere.
3. Whether the Ninth Circuit, in conflict with the First Circuit and in tension with the opinions of this Court and several other circuits, correctly held that a defendant can be an “arranger” under CERCLA even if the defendant did not arrange for anyone else to dispose of or treat the waste.
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in In re Gold King Mine Release in San Juan, County on August 5, 2015 (D.N.M.):
41 Harrison Western Construction MTD
61 Navajo Nation Response to 44
67 Navajo Nation Response to 42 and 52
133 EPA Reply in Support of 114
Prior post here.
Briefs here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.