Here is the complaint in United States v. Lynden Inc. (W.D. Wash.):

Here are the materials in Duwamish Tribe v. Haaland (W.D. Wash.):
14 Muckleshoot Motion to Intervene
Complaint here.
Here are the materials in Davis v. King County (Wash. Ct. App.):
79696-6-8-I Appellants’ Motion for Reconsideration
79696-6-8-I Appellees’ Response to Motion for Reconsideration
Prior post here.
Here is the complaint in State of Washington v. Vought (W.D. Wash.):
15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction
37 Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Proposed Form of Injunctive Relief
News coverage:
Washington AG press release: https://www.atg.wa.gov/news/news-releases/ag-ferguson-announces-coalition-lawsuit-save-national-archives
Indian Country Today: https://indiancountrytoday.com/news/tribes-sue-to-stop-relocation-of-rare-documents-3wsWTPg0fka-vOAV1Uoj2g
Seattle Times: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/ag-ferguson-with-tribes-and-historic-groups-sues-feds-over-seattle-national-archives-closure/
Spokesman Review: https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2021/jan/04/ag-bob-ferguson-sues-to-stop-sale-of-seattle-natio/
Yakama Nation press release:
Press Release_YN_OMB_Seattle Archives Lawsuit (1.4.21) (002)
Here are the materials in Davis v. King County (Wash. Ct. App.):
9-27-19 Amended Appellees’ Joint Response Brief
09-09-19 Appellees’ Joint Response Brief
An excerpt:
“Before addressing each of the estate’s arguments, we acknowledge that Davis’s death is tragic and echo the trial court’s sentiment that the application of RCW 4.24.420 here is problematic because it precludes claims where law enforcement officers’ actions and training may have been unreasonable, given their knowledge that the individual they were confronting was suicidal and armed. RCW 4.24.420 prevents courts and juries from reaching the issue of whether law enforcement’s negligence resulted in the loss of life. The statute is clear and precludes our evaluation of these policy questions.”
The Washington Supreme Court has upheld a state law allowing tribal fee lands used for economic development projects to be exempt from state taxes provided that the tribe pays a payment in lieu of tax. (PILT). The case concerned Muckleshoot-owned lands and Muckleshoot filed an amicus brief in the case. Here is the opinion in City of Snoqualmie v. King County Executive Dow Constantine.
Download petition here.
A Land Use Petition was filed in King County Superior Court on May 27, 2016 on behalf of the Snoqualmie Indian Tribe seeking to vacate a 2003 state environmental determination and 2016 Development Agreement that paves the way for a hotel expansion and residential development on an ancient Snoqualmie burial ground adjacent to Snoqualmie Falls, which is owned by the Muckleshoot Tribe. The Petition also asserts that the development imposes an unconstitutional burden on Snoqualmie tribal members’ constitutional right to religious freedom.
Here is the complaint in Ferguson v. King County (Pierce County Superior Court):
King County Sexual Harassment Complaint
From page 9:
Provenzo regularly told Belinda not to fully investigate rape or sexual assault cases that occurred on the Muckleshoot Indian reservation, because rape happens on the reservation “all the time.”
Thanks to Trent Crable and Diana Bob for the find.
You must be logged in to post a comment.