Here are the materials in State of Connecticut v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
18 Interior Motion for Partial Dismiss
23 Plaintiffs Opposition to 11
32 Interior Reply in Support of 18
Here are the materials in State of Connecticut v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
18 Interior Motion for Partial Dismiss
23 Plaintiffs Opposition to 11
32 Interior Reply in Support of 18
Here are the materials in Fort McDermitt Paiute & Shoshone Tribe v. Price (D. D.C.):
Here are the materials in Forest County Potawatomi Community v. United States (D.D.C.):
79-1 Forest County Motion for Summary J
Prior posts here.
Here are the materials in Kialegee Tribal Town v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
Here is the complaint in Muscogee Creek Indian Freedmen Band, Inc. v. Zinke (D.D.C.).
From the press release:
The Muscogee Creek Nation (“MNC”), with full knowledge and approval of the DOI, continues to deny so-called “Creek Freedmen” and their Descendants their Creek citizenship in violation of the Creek Treaty of 1866, the Constitution of the United States, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the Indian Civil Rights Act. The so-called Creek Freedmen continue to be denied basic rights of citizenship including but not limited to their right to vote, right to hold office, and right to be recognized for who they are: Creek Indians by birthright, heritage, history, and culture. The named Defendants are the Creek Nation Principal Chief,James Floyd; the United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”); and the Hon. Ryan Zinke, Secretary of DOI.
Here is the complaint in North Sound Health Corp. v. Azar (D.D.C.):
Here is the complaint in Cavazos v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
The plaintiffs are represented by Gerald Torres, Michael Sliger, and Hope Babcock.
News coverage: “Expelled Tribe Members Say Feds Did Nothing to Protect Their Rights”
Update:
Here:
Here are the new materials in Cayuga Nation v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.