Here are the orders (they are the same) in West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. Haaland (D.D.C.):
And in Monterra MF v. Haaland (D.D.C.):
Briefs in both cases here.
D.C. District Court
Federal Court Rejects Alaska Tribe’s Gaming Claim
Here is the order in Native Village of Eklutna v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
Briefs here.
Navajo Nation Prevails over Interior on Interpretation of Administrative Procedure in ISDEAA Negotiations
Here are the materials in Navajo Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
D.C. Federal Court Dismisses Ute Tribe’s Water Rights Suit, Transfer Some Claims to Utah Federal Court
Here are the materials in Ute Indian Tribe v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
70-1 Water District Motion to District
89 Water District Reply in Support of 70
Federal Suit(s) Filed against Seminole Gaming Compact [updated]
Here are relevant materials in West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. Haaland (D.D.C.):
Updates (10/14/21, 10/19/21, 10/21/21, 11/23/21)
24 Seminole Reply in Support of 13
31 WF Opposition to Motion to Transfer
Here are materials in West Flagler Associates Ltd. v. DeSantis (N.D. Fla.):
21 Seminole Motion to Intervene and Dismiss
33 Desantis Reply in Support of 20
Update (10/19/2021):
Here are materials in Monterra MF v. Haaland (D.D.C.):
Federal Court Dismisses Kickapoo Member’s Challenge to Federally Approved Wind Energy Project
Here are the materials in Mattwaoshshe v. United States (D.D.C.):
38-1 Soldier Creek Wind Motion to Dismiss
39-1 Nextera Energy Motion to Dismiss
40-1 Westar Energy Motion to Dismiss
Not that it would matter much in this issue, but I can’t help but point out of the more anomalously interpreted Indian law statutes of all time is briefly discussed in this opinion. Here is the law, 25 U.S.C. sec. 175:
In all States and Territories where there are reservations or allotted Indians the United States attorney shall represent them in all suits at law and in equity.
Seems pretty clear, eh? No chance. 🙂 Yet another example of the word “shall” being interpreted as the exact opposite of its meaning. . . .
BIA Prisoner Loses FOIA Suit against BIA because BIA Provided Everything Demanded
Here is the order in Kovalevich v. Bureau of Indian Affairs (D.D.C.):
Catawba Nation Prevails against Cherokee Nations in Trust Land Matter
Here is the opinion in Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Briefs here.
Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Motions in Native Village of Eklutna Bingo Case
Here are the briefs in Native Village of Eklutna v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
51-1 Eklutna Motion for Summary J
Complaint posted here.
Federal Court Denies Injunction on Enbridge Line 3, Too
Here are the materials in Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.