Here are the materials so far in State of Connecticut v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Conn.):

Here are the materials so far in State of Connecticut v. Dept. of the Interior (D. Conn.):

Here are the materials so far in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):

Here is the brief in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Burgam:
Cert petition here.
Here is the complaint in Lytton Rancheria of California v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

Here are updated materials in Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
Prior post here.

Here are the materials in Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):
28 Motion to Disqualify Jenner
40-1 Coquille Opposition to Motion to Disqualify Jenner
51 Federal Opposition to TRO Motion
52 Coquille Opposition to TRO Motion
Jan. 22, 2025: MINUTE ORDER. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing held on this date, (1) Plaintiffs’ 28 Motion to Disqualify Keither Harper and Jenner & Block is denied; (2) Coquille’s 15 Motion to Intervene and 33 Renewed Motion to Intervene are granted; (3) Coquille’s 15 Motion to Expedite is denied as moot; and (4) the parties’ 40 , 41 motions to seal are denied and the Clerk of Court shall unseal those docket entries. Further, by January 24, 2025, Plaintiffs shall file all materials submitted for in camera review on the public docket. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 1/22/2025. (lcapm3) (Entered: 01/22/2025)

Here:
Questions presented:
The Michigan Indian Land Claims Settlement Act (“MILCSA”) established a Self-Sufficiency Fund for the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians to receive judgment funds that settled claims against the United States for the unconscionable taking of tribal lands. The statute, which codified a negotiated agreement between the Tribe and the United States, gave the Tribe’s Board of Directors exclusive authority over the Self-Sufficiency Fund, including determinations about the proper use of Fund capital and interest. The broad purposes for which the Tribe may expend Fund interest under MILCSA include the “enhancement of tribal lands.” §108(c)(5). And MILCSA requires the Secretary of the Interior to hold in trust “[a]ny lands” acquired with Fund interest. §108(f). The questions presented are:
Lower court materials here.
Additional briefs:

Here are the materials in State of Alaska v. Newland (D. Alaska):

You must be logged in to post a comment.