
The following screenshots come from the Smithsonian’s collection of issues of “Indians at Work.”




The following screenshots come from the Smithsonian’s collection of issues of “Indians at Work.”
The Harvard Law Review has posted a Note, “Tribal Power, Worker Power: Organizing Unions in the Context of Native Sovereignty.” PDF
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Should this Court reconsider Chevron?
2. Does the National Labor Relations Act apply to Indian tribes?
3. Does the employee-to-employee solicitation rule in Republic Aviation empower employees to solicit customers in business “guest areas” like restrooms and restaurants?
Here is the opinion in Casino Pauma v. NLRB. From the court’s syllabus:
The panel granted the National Labor Relations Board’s petition for enforcement of its order; denied Casino Pauma’s petition for review; and upheld the Board’s conclusions that it may apply the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) to the relationship between employees working in commercial gaming establishments on tribal lands and the tribal governments that own and manage the establishments, and that Casino Pauma committed unfair labor practices in violation of the NLRA by trying to stop union literature distribution.
Briefs here.
Here.
Here they are for the LRB v. NLRB petition:
Little River Petition and Appendix COMBINED
Here they are for Soaring Eagle v. NLRB:
Saginaw Cert Petition and Appendix- Filed
All the briefs are available here at the background materials page for these two cases.
These materials have been submitted for the June 23 Conference at the Supreme Court (docket page here and here).
Here are the materials relevant to Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal Government v. NLRB.
Supreme Court cert stage briefs
Little River Petition and Appendix COMBINED
Final CO-UMUT Amicus Cert Petition – Saginaw Chippewa and LRB
National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
Sixth Circuit En Banc Stage Continue reading
You must be logged in to post a comment.