Here are the new materials in Corporate Commission of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians v. Money Centers of America (D. Minn.):
258 Mlle Lacs Motion for Summary J
Here are the new materials in Corporate Commission of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians v. Money Centers of America (D. Minn.):
258 Mlle Lacs Motion for Summary J
Here are the materials in KG Urban v. Patrick (D. Mass.):
140 Mass Gaming Commission Motion for Summary J
143 KG Urban Motion for Summary J
152 Mass Gaming Commission Opposition
153 Mass Gaming Commission Reply
News coverage here.
Prior posts in this case are here, here, here, and here. First Circuit materials are here.
At the invitation of Alex Pearl and the FIU Law Review to write a symposium piece on Florida Indian history and law, a challenge for me since I know very little about it, I came up with “The Seminole Tribe and the Origins of Indian Gaming.” Assuming the law review finds it publishable, it will appear in the FIU Law Review alongside the work of luminaries like Siegfriend Weissner and Sarah Krakoff.
Here is the abstract:
The Seminole Tribe of Florida has played perhaps the most important role in the origins and development of Indian gaming in the United States of any single tribe. The tribe opened the first tribally owned high stakes bingo hall in 1979. The tribe in 1981 was involved in one of the earliest lower court decisions forming the basis of the legal theory excluding most states from the regulation of high stakes bingo, a theory that Congress largely codified in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) years later. The tribe was a party to the Supreme Court decision in 1996 that radically altered the bargaining power between tribes and states over the negotiation and regulation of casino-style gaming under IGRA. And more recently, the tribe has been a leading participant in negotiations and litigation over the regulatory landscape of Indian gaming after the 1996 decision. The Tribe is one of the most successful Indian gaming tribes in the nation.
This paper traces that history, but also offers thoughts on how the culture and traditional governance structures of the Seminole Tribe played a part in its leadership role in the arena of Indian gaming.
Here is the complaint in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (Sup. Jud. Ct. — Suffolk Co.):
Here (subscription required but you can sign on for free trial):
Materials here:
Press release text here:
Twenty-five years to the day after Congress enacted the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa began a new era of Indian gaming. On October 17, 2013, the Tribe’s governing body voted unanimously to ratify an inter-tribal agreement to create the Tribal Internet Gaming Alliance (TIGA). The agreement, being called an inter-tribal treaty, will organize tribes across the country to both offer and regulate internet and mobile phone gaming. Until laws change, TIGA will accept real-money wagers only from people who are physically present in the member tribes’ jurisdictions, such as patrons at tribal casinos and visitors to other tribal lands. When customers are outside of tribal jurisdiction, the games will be fun-play and will offer casino promotions. Games will be those categorized as class II under IGRA, such as slot-like bingo, traditional bingo, pull tabs, and poker. Because the games are class II, no tribal-state compacts will have to be amended.
Using this strategy, TIGA tribes will jump ahead of the online competition and get extremely valuable experience with real-money wagering before other tribes and gaming operations. The idea for TIGA began among tribes in Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan. TIGA developments are now being followed by 28 tribes in 13 states.
Attached you will find: 1) a TIGA Fact Sheet; 2) a media release from the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa; and 3) a copy of the TIGA Treaty.
If you have any questions or would like to have a unique quote, please contact me. I am an Indian gaming attorney at the law firm of Kanji & Katzen, a former Senior Attorney at the National Indian Gaming Commission and a former Assistant Solicitor at the United States Department of the Interior. You may reach me by email or at (202) 261-6528.
Here are the materials in Corporate Commission of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians v. Money Centers of America (D. Minn.):
155 Baena Advisors Motion to Dismiss
160 Real Estate Empowered Motion to Dismiss
169 Mille Lacs Motion for Summary J
180 Mille Lacs Opposition to 160
181 Mille Lacs Opposition to MCA Motions
182 MCA Opposition to Mille Lacs Motion
185 MCA Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
186 MCA Reply in Support of Motion for Summary J
199 Melanie Banjamin Motion to Quash
205 MCA Opposition to Motion to Quash
211 MJ Order Granting Motion to Quash
240 DCT Order re Motion to Dismiss
241 MJ Order re Motion to Compel
Prior materials here.
Here are the new materials in Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of Ledyard (2d Cir.):
Amicus Brief in Support of En Banc Petition — Seminole, Umatilla, and Coquille
Panel decision and briefs are here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.