Here:
North Fork Rancheria Opposition Brief
UPDATE 12/12/18): Reply
Cert petition here.
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept.of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
37 north fork rancheria motion for summary j
39 north fork opposition to 29
41 interior motion for summary j
46 sufc opposition to motions for summary j
51 north fork reply in support of 37
Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
36-1 club one casino motion for summary j
Prior post here.
Here:
Questions presented:
1. This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community.
2. This case presents the question whether multiple Indians residing on the same reservation are, per se, an “Indian tribe” irrespective of the individual Indians‘ tribal affiliations, if any.
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Club One Casino Inc. v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior:
Picayune Rancheria Opening Brief
North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians Brief
Lower court materials here.
Here are the opinions in Stand Up For California v. State of California (PDF). An excerpt from the lead opinion:
The judgment is reversed. The Governor’s concurrence is invalid under the facts alleged in this case. Plaintiffs have stated a cause of action for a writ of mandate to set the concurrence aside on the ground that it is unsupported by legal authority. The matter is remanded for further proceedings, and the trial court is directed to vacate its order sustaining the demurrers and enter a new order overruling them.
Briefs:
You must be logged in to post a comment.