Here.
Here.
Here.
An excerpt:
A written statement from Bay Mills Chair Kurt Perron says the tribe ultimately plans legal victory, and to move forward with its “planned developments.” The tribe did not immediate elaborate on the statement’s meaning.
If Bay Mills is ultimately victorious, the tribe would likely be allowed to build casinos anywhere it wants, without state approval, as long as it buys the land with a specific pool of funds.
“Probably the biggest implication (of today’s ruling) in the long run is just to highlight exactly how difficult it is to shut down a casino opened by an Indian tribe under these circumstances,” says Matthew Fletcher, of MSU’s Indigenous Law Center.
The Vanderbilt Casino is widely regarded as a test site for its Upper Peninsula owner. The tribe has expressed interest in building in Port Huron, and perhaps elsewhere.
It’s not clear what implications this case might have for another Upper Peninsula tribe’s plans to build a casino in downtown Lansing.
Here is today’s opinion (PDF).
Here are the briefs:
BMIC Opening Brief in CA6 Appeal
State of Michigan Appellee Brief
BMIC Motion to Strike Appellee Briefs
Lower court materials here.
Here is the casino:

Guess they can take this sign down now:

Here are the recent materials:
Here is the article.
Here are the additional materials in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (N.D. Okla.):
Hobia Motion for Reconsideration
Oklahoma Opposition to Reconsideration Motion
Hobia Reply in Reconsideration Motion
DCT Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
DCT Order Granting Modification of Injunction
Our prior post on this case is here.
Here are updated materials, with the district court now asking the parties to brief in the import of the Patchak decision:
Interior Motion to Dismiss Kansas Cross Claims
Kansas Opposition to Interior Motion
Wyandotte Motion to Dismiss Kansas Cross Claims
Kansas Opposition to Wyandotte Motion
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.