Here is the unpublished opinion in JW Gaming Development LLC v. James.
Materials here.
RICO
Late Summer Update in Williams & Cochrane v. Quechan & Rosette Litigation
Here are the new materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
216 DCT Order Dismissing W&C Reply Claim
217 DCT Order Dismissing Claims against Rosette
Prior posts here.
UPDATE (12/16/19):
219-1 Motion for Reconsideration of 216
Canadian First Nation’s Payday Lending Partners’ Convictions for RICO Violations in US Affirmed by Third Circuit
Here is the unpublished opinion in United States v. Neff:
Briefs:
Pinoville Pomo Nation Petition to Ninth Circuit to Halt Discovery Pending Appeal Fails
Here is the unpublished opinion in In re Pinoville Pomo Nation [Pinoville Gaming Authority v. United States District Court].
Here are the briefs:
The appeal docs are here.
Ninth Circuit Materials in JW Gaming Development v. James [Pinoleville Pomo Nation]
Thanksgiving Update of Williams & Cochrane v. Quechan & Rosette Litigation [updated June 5, 2019]
Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
138-1 W&C Motion to Dismiss Quechan Counterclaims [94]
148 W&C Response to Quechan MTD [115]
150 W&C Opposition to Rosette Motion to Strike [109]
151 W&C Opposition to Rosette MTD [110]
161 Rosette Reply in Support of 109
162 Quechan Reply in Support of 115
167 W&C Reply in Support of 94
Prior posts here.
UPDATE:
Federal Court Dismisses Tort Claim against Crow Health Care Center
Here are the materials in Wilhite v. Awe Kualawaache Care Center (D. Mont.):
29 Motion to Dismiss – sovereign immunity
Prior post here.
Federal Court Allows Civil RICO Suit to Proceed against Crow Nation-Owned Health Facility
Here are the materials in Wilhite v. Awe Kualawaache Care Center (D. Mont.):
Update in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe
Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
71-1 Motion to File Supplemental Complaint
ADDITIONAL UPDATE (8/27/18):
98 Quechan Opposition to Motion to Strike
105-1 Motion to File Third Amended Complaint
105-2 Proposed Third Amended Complaint
109-1 Rosette Motion to Strike
110-1 Rosette Motion to Dismiss
115-1 Quechan Motion to Dismiss
Prior post here.
Federal Court Dismisses Most Claims in Battle of Law Firms over Quechan Legal Work
Here are the materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.