Here are the materials in Matyascik v. Arctic Slope Native Ass’n (D. Alaska):
tribal sovereign immunity
New York Oneida Prevails in Property Dispute involving Reservation Lands
Here are the materials in Oneida Indian Nation v. Phillips (N.D. N.Y.):
32-1-oneida-motion-for-judgment.pdf
Prior post here.
Federal Court Declines Jurisdiction over Nisqually Officials under Ex parte Young
Here are the new materials in Bell v. City of Lacey (W.D. Wash.):
53-bell-response-to-tribe-mtd.pdf
Prior pleadings, including the tribe’s motion on the pleadings (docket no. 36), are here.
Ninth Circuit Affirms Rule 19 Dismissal of Environmental Challenge to Four Corners Power Plant
Federal Court Dismisses Employment Action against Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
Here are the materials in Wilson v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (D. Alaska):
32 Motion to Disqualify Counsel
57 Plaintiffs’ Response to 32 and 51
73 Plaintiffs’ Response to 51 + Motion for Discovery
78 Opposition to Motion for Discovery
Fourth Circuit Favors Tribal Immunity in Williams v. Big Picture Loans LLC
Prisoner Complaint against Nisqually Tribe Dismissed
Here are the materials in Bell v. City of Lacey (W.D. Wash.):
SCOTUS Denies Cert in Poarch Band v. Wilkes
Federal Court Rejects Rule 19 Motion by Guidiville Rancheria
Here are the materials in Sprawldef v. City of Richmond (N.D. Cal.):
No State Sovereign Immunity in Patent Case [Relying on Saint Regis Mohawk Decision]
From the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals:
And, contrary to UMN’s arguments, Saint Regis did not
base its reasoning on implied abrogation of tribal sovereign
immunity. Instead, Saint Regis concluded that IPR was an
agency reconsideration proceeding to which sovereign immunity does not apply in the first instance. 896 F.3d at 1329. This reasoning applies equally to states as it does to
tribes.
Article discussing the opinion here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.