D.C. Federal Court Vacates Trump Administration Recission of Gaming Lands Opinion re: Scotts Valley

Here are the new materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):

92 Second Amended Complaint

96-1 Scotts Valley MSJ

98 GTL Properties Amicus Brief

99-1 Federal MSJ

107 United Auburn Community Amicus Brief

108 Dehe Wintun Tribes Amicus Brief

109 Cal Indian Gaming Commission Amicus Brief

110 Lytton Rancheria Amicus Brief

111 Scotts Valley Reply

112 Federal Reply

115 DCT Order

Prior post here.

not the right tribes, I know.

Amended Complaint in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgum

Here:

Prior post here.

D.C. Federal Court Refuses to Enjoin Interior’s Reversal of Scotts Valley Decision

Here are the new materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):

3-1 Motion for Injunction

47 Opposition

57 United Auburn Community Amicus Brief

58 Lytton Rancheria Amicus Brief

63 Reply

75 GTL Properties Amicus Brief

76 COLT Amicus Brief

83 DCT Order

Prior post here.

D.C. Federal Court Denies Intervention in Scotts Valley Gaming Case

Here are the intervention materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Burgam (D.D.C.):

12 First Amended Complaint

15 UAC Motion to Intervene

16-1 Wintun Tribes Motion to Intervene

20-1 GTL Motion to Intervene

29 Federal Opposition to Tribal Motions

30 Federal Opposition to 20

31 Scotts Valley Combined Opposition

34 GTL Reply

35 UAC Reply

36 Wintun Tribes Reply

38 DCT Order on Intervention

Prior post here.

D.C. Circuit Rejects Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Intervention in Scotts Valley Band Pomo Indian Lands Case

Here is the opinion in Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation v. Dept. of the Interior.

Briefs:

Yocha Dehe Brief

Federal Brief

Scotts Valley Brief

Reply

Lower court materials here.

Federal Court Dismisses Tort Claim against Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Gaming Company

Here are the materials in Nguyen v. Cache Creek Resort Casino (E.D. Cal.):

1 Complaint

24 Motion to Dismiss

25 Opposition

28 Reply

29 Motion for Sanctions

31 Magistrate Report

Update in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Dept. of the Interior

Here are updated materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

34 DCt Order on Supplementing Admin Record

37 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Motion for Reconsideration

38 Opposition

39 Reply

40 DCT Order Denying Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Motion

Prior post here.

Federal Court Rejects Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Intervention in Scotts Valley Band Pomo Indian Lands Case

Here are the new materials in Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

17-1 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Motion to Intervene

18 Scotts Valley Opposition

19 Reply

33 DCT Order

Complaint posted here.

Washington Football Team Hires Lobbyist

Here.

And here’s the anti-Redskins commercial paid for by the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation, which was aired during prime-time during the NBA finals. The ad first made the rounds online during the Super Bowl earlier this year.

Ninth Circuit Denies Rehearing/En Banc Review of Maxwell v. County of San Diego — Tribal Officials Not Immune under Section 1983

Here is the order:

Maxwell v. County of San Diego (9th 2013)

An excerpt:

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing in case number 10-56671; Judges Clifton and Ikuta vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Farris so recommends. Judges Farris and Clifton vote to deny the petition for rehearing in case number 10-56706; Judge Clifton votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Farris so recommends. Judge Ikuta votes to grant the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matters en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for panel rehearing and the petitions for  rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Earlier materials are here: panel opinion materials and en banc petition.