Grand Traverse Band Sues Polluter

Here is the amended complaint in Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians v. Burnette Foods Inc. (W.D. Mich.):

Court of Federal Claims Dismisses Suit against U.S. Arising from Winnemucca Leadership Dispute

Here are the materials in Winnemucca Indian Colony v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

Arizona Federal Court Dismisses Suit against Salt River’s Great Wolf Lodge Brought by Anti-Masking Assholes

Here are (many of the) materials in Preciado v. Great Wolf Lodge (D. Ariz.):

1 Complaint

23 Motion to Dismiss Tribe Defendants

24 Motion to Dismiss GWL Defendants

27 Motion to Strike 23

29 Motion to Strike 24

32 Reply ISO 24

36 Reply ISO 23

51 DCT Order

Lost mask in Midway Geyser by National Park Service is licensed under CC-CC0 1.0

Lexington Insurance Co. v. Smith [Suquamish] Ninth Circuit Oral Argument Video

Briefs here.

ABA Webinar on the NDN Law Cases of the 2022 Term

Join us for a free webinar hosted by the ABA CRSJ discussing Indian law cases decided by SCOTUS this term. We have a great panel, Erin Doughtery Lynch, Shay Dvoretzky, Matthew Fletcher, Lenny Powell, Pratik Shah, who will discuss the cases and the broader impact on federal Indian law principles.

Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2023
Time: 3:00 PM – 4:30 PM ET

Register HERE: https://lnkd.in/gZz6YWnJ

United States v. Michigan Consent Decree Approved by Federal Court

Here are the materials in United States v. Michigan (W.D. Mich.):

My last half-assed effort to keep up with the pleadings is here.

And since there are still potential billable hours, except a robust and wasteful appeal or several and, ultimately, a cert petition or several.

San Manuel Amicus Brief in Cal. SCT Insurance Case

Here is the amicus brief in Another Planet Entertainment LLC v. Vigilant Ins. Co. (Cal. S. Ct.):

New Scholarship on AI and Indian Country

Adam Crepelle and Ilia Murtazashvili have posted “Artificial Intelligence on Indian Reservations in the United States: Prospects and Challenges” on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Increases in computing power have contributed to tremendous improvements in Artificial Intelligence (AI). Despite increasing deployment of AI by public, private, and nonprofit organizations, consideration of AI on American Indian reservations remains in its infancy. In this paper, we suggest that consideration of Internet policy on tribal lands should be expanded beyond consideration of barriers to broadband access to include responsible adoption of emergent technologies, including AI. To facilitate such consideration, we consider the prospects and challenge for deployment of AI in public, private, and nonprofit applications on Indian reservations in the United States. Our particular focus is on how specific aspects of reservations offer unique opportunities as well as challenges for deployment of AI. We also argue that an important frontier in the Indigenous Data Sovereignty movement is to develop principles for responsible use of AI on reservations.

Of note, the paper asserts that AI might be especially useful for tribal courts: “Rightly or wrongly, people may have more confidence in AI than tribal judges.” OUCH.

DALL-E’s answer to “robot as tribal judge”

Virginia Federal Court Holds LdF Council Members and Employees Can Be Individually Liable for RICO Damages Arising from Sovereign Lending

Here are the materials in Fitzgerald v. Wildcat (W.D. Va.):

145 Skytrail Motion to Compel Arbitration

147 Skytrail Motion to Dismiss

149 Wildcat Motion to Compel

151 Wildcat Motion to Dismiss

152 Response to 145

153 Response to 147

154 Response to 149

155 Response to 151

163 Reply ISO 147

164 Reply ISO 145

165 Reply ISO 149

166 Reply ISO 151

170 DCT Order