
Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Washington Federal Court Holds that Railroad is Liable for Trespass on Swinomish Lands
Here are the available trial materials from Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v BNSF Railway Company (W.D. Wash.):
And here is the judge’s decision:
Prior post here.
Montana Federal Court Declines to Enjoin Montana’s Human Rights Board from Enforcing COVID/Vaccination Laws on Blackfeet
Here are the new materials in Glacier County Regional Port Authority v. Esau (D. Mont.):
20 Glacier County Motion for Preliminary Injunction
25 Montana Human Rights Bureau Response
34 Montana Human Rights Bureau Response to 20
50 Amended Blackfeet Nation Intervenor Complaint
62 Blackfeet Nation Response to 20
Seneca-Cayuga Sues Oklahoma Officials over Reservation Boundaries Post-McGirt
Here is the complaint in Seneca-Cayuga Nation v. Drummond (N.D. Okla.):

Update: Here is the complaint in Eastern Shawnee Tribe v. Drummond:
Tenth Circuit Oral Argument Audio in Hooper v. City of Tulsa
D.C. Circuit Issues CARES Act Opinion in Shawnee v. Yellen, or is it Miccosukee v. Yellen or Prairie Band Potawatomi v. Yellen?
Here is the opinion in Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation v. Yellen. Long story short, Shawnee settled (I think) so they’re out, Miccosukee is out because their challenge is moot, and Prairie Band gets a remand ‘cuz the gummint’s got some ‘splaining to do. No zhoonya for tribal interests here, though the billables keep coming.
Briefs:
Lower court materials here (I think).

The Work of Sovereignty Symposium — March 30 – April 1
Here.

Ninth Circuit En Banc Oral Argument in Apache Stronghold v. United States
NYU Law School Panel on Indigenous Sovereignty: “Law On Our Terms” — March 30, 2023

Tenth Circuit Rules in Favor of Jemez Pueblo’s Aboriginal Rights Suit re: Valles Caldera

Here is the opinion in Pueblo of Jemez v. United States.
An excerpt:
In our circuit, both before and after Jemez I, the Jemez Pueblo could lose its established aboriginal title to Banco Bonito only if its title had been extinguished or abandoned. And the district court concluded that neither of those conditions had occurred. So in accordance with longstanding Supreme Court precedent, and by the district court’s findings, the Jemez Pueblo still has aboriginal title to Banco Bonito.
Links to briefs and lower court materials here.

You must be logged in to post a comment.