Ann Tweedy has published “Uncovering the Little Known History of History of Suffragists of Color” in JOTWELL. The article reviews Cathleen D. Cahill, Recasting the Vote: How Women of Color Transformed the Suffrage Movement (2020).
Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
2021 Inaugural Morelli Colloquy — Belonging and Difference: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Here. My presentation materials are here: Anishinaabe Gaganoozh Comic Book.
Schedule
Welcome and Introductions | 9:00-9:15 a.m.
Opening Keynote Conversation | 9:15-10:15 a.m.
- Tiffany N. Florvil (University of New Mexico College of Arts & Sciences)
- Natsu Taylor Saito (Georgia State University College of Law)
Break | 10:15-10:30 a.m.
First Panel | 10:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.
- Jeannine Bell (Indiana University Maurer School of Law)
- Manuela Boatcă (Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg Institute for Sociology)
- Matthew L.M. Fletcher (Michigan State University College of Law)
Lunch Break | 12:00-1:00 p.m.
Second Panel | 1:00-2:30 p.m.
- Sahar Aziz (Rutgers Law School)
- Chandra Frank (University of Cincinnati College of Arts and Sciences)
- Khary Oronde Polk (Amherst College, Departments of Black Studies and Sexuality, Women’s & Gender Studies)
Closing Conversation | 2:30-3:30 p.m.
- Sunnie Rucker-Chang (University of Cincinnati College of Arts and Sciences)
- Yolanda Vázquez (University of Cincinnati College of Law)
Planning Committee
Emily Houh
University of Cincinnati College of Law
Co-founder, Jones Center for Race, Gender, and Social Justice
Kristin Kalsem
University of Cincinnati College of Law
Co-founder, Jones Center for Race, Gender, and Social Justice
Sunnie Rucker-Chang
University of Cincinnati College of Arts & Sciences
Assistant Professor of Slavic, Director of European Studies
Former Wind River Chief Judge Disbarred by Wyoming SCT
Here is the order in Board of Professional Responsibility v. Smith:
Interior: “Robert Anderson Nominated as Solicitor of the Department of the Interior”
Here.
Inuit Ataqatigiit Party Wins Greenland Elections
Here is “China’s Greenland Ambitions Run Into Local Politics, U.S. Influence” [Wall Street Journal].
D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge to MHA Nation’s Election
Cert Petition in Seneca Nation Citizen’s Treaty-Based Tax Immunity Claim
Here is the petition in Perkins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue:
Perkins v. Commissioner Cert Petition
Question presented:
This Court is presented with a question of first impression, as to the taxability of income derived from the sale of sand and gravel, mined from treatyprotected land by an enrolled member of the Seneca Nation of Indians (“Seneca Nation”). Upon the granting of certiorari, the Court will examine the language in two federal treaties, promising not to disturb the “free use and enjoyment” of lands by the Seneca Nation and “their Indian friends residing thereon and united with them,” and protecting these lands “from all taxes” for any purpose. Treaty with the Six Nations (“Canandaigua Treaty”), art. III, Nov. 11, 1794, 7 Stat. 45; Treaty with the Senecas (“1842 Treaty”), art. 9th, May 20, 1842, 7 Stat. 590. Congress has explicitly stated the Internal Revenue Code “shall be applied to any taxpayer with due regard to any treaty obligation of the United States which applies to such taxpayer.” 26 U.S.C.A. § 894 (a)(1)(West).
The question presented is whether the United States Court of Appeals and the United States Tax Court have given “due regards” to the treaty obligations of the United States by finding these treaties had no textual support for an exemption from federal income tax applicable to an enrolled Seneca member whose income is derived from the
lands of the Seneca Nation. Perkins v. Comm’r, 970 F.3d 148, 162-67 (2d. Cir. 2020).
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE (5/1/21):
2021 Indian Law Focused Issue of the Federal Lawyer
The Regulatory Review [Penn.] Series: “Native Peoples, Tribal Sovereignty, and Regulation”
Here.
The description:
For the first time in U.S. history, a Native American will lead a cabinet-level department in the U.S. federal government. Secretary of the Interior Debra Haaland now heads the federal agency primarily responsible for coordinating the U.S. government’s complex regulatory relationships with Native Nations.
These relationships are predicated on tribal sovereignty—tribes’ inherent authority to “make their own laws and be governed by them.” Accordingly, the United States is obligated to promote tribal self-determination and tribes’ ability to provide for the health and welfare of tribal citizens within tribal lands. Yet despite its formal recognition of a certain degree of Native sovereignty, the federal government has also exercised significant control over tribal peoples and lands. Throughout U.S. history, federal administrative bodies, such as the U.S. Department of the Interior, have often failed to uphold the promises and obligations of sovereignty adequately.
In this series of essays, scholars and practitioners explore some of the most pressing regulatory issues affecting how Native American communities experience government and law, as well as how existing systems of power ignore and exclude Native peoples and governments.
The Regulatory Review is thrilled to feature this series of essays highlighting the effects that regulation has on Native individuals and communities. The series’ contributors include: Maggie Blackhawk, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Emily deLisle, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Katherine Florey, University of California, Davis School of Law; Dylan R. Hedden-Nicely, University of Idaho College of Law; Hillary M. Hoffmann, Vermont Law School; Aila Hoss, University of Tulsa College of Law; Sarah E. Krakoff, University of Colorado Law School; Elizabeth Kronk Warner, University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law; Sarah Roubidoux Lawson, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC; Robert J. Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law; Monte Mills, University of Montana Alexander Blewett III School of Law; Megan Powell, First American Title Insurance Company; Ezra Rosser, American University Washington College of Law; Joe Sexton, Galanda Broadman PLLC; Judith A. Shapiro, Big Fire Law & Policy Group; Jessica A. Shoemaker, University of Nebraska College of Law; and Ann E. Tweedy, University of South Dakota School of Law.
US DOJ Journal of Federal Law and Practice: New Issue on MMIP
Here: “March – Missing or Murdered Indigenous Persons: Legal, Prosecution, Advocacy and Healthcare.”
Previous issue here.


You must be logged in to post a comment.