Meyers v. Wisconsin Oneida Cert Petition — Another Immunity Case

Here is the petition in Meyers v. Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin:

Cert petition

Questions presented:

1. Whether Congress abrogated the sovereign immunity of an Indian tribe under 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq., by providing that “any…government” may be liable for damages.
2. Whether an individual who receives a computer generated cash register receipt displaying more than the last five digits of the individual’s credit card number and the card’s expiration date has suffered a concrete injury sufficient to confer standing under Article III of the United States Constitution.

Lower court materials here.

Federals Prevail in Online Tribal Bingo Suit

Here are the materials in State of California v. Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel (S.D. Cal.):

61 US Motion

63 CA Motion

67 Tribal Response

68 US Reply

69 CA Reply

80 DCT Order Granting US Motion

Prior post here.

Alaska Federation of Natives Files Cert Stage Amicus Brief in Polar Bear Case

Here is the brief filed in Alaska v. Jewell:

afn-amicus-brief

Here are the cert petitions:

alaska-cert-petition

alaska-oil-gas-assn-cert-petition

Federal Claims Court Dismisses Action by “Chakchiuma Nation”

Here are the materials in Chakchiuma Nation v. United States (Fed. Cl.):

6-motion-to-dismiss

7-response

8-reply

10-order

WaPo: Ryan Zinke Named as Interior Secretary Nominee

Here.

Ninth Circuit Rules against Yakama/King Mountain in Tax Dispute with Federals

Here is the opinion in Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation v. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.

Briefs and lower court materials here.

Cherokee Nation AG Opines that Cherokee Constitution Protects Fundamental Right to Marriage; Same-Sex Marriage Legal at Cherokee

Here is the opinion:

Hembree Opinion

An excerpt:

For the reasons discussed below, it is the official opinion of the Attorney General that the Cherokee Nation Constitution protects the fundamental right to marry, establish a family, raise children and enjoy the full protection of the Nation’s marital laws. The Nation may not deny the issuance of a marriage license to two persons, or refuse to recognize their marriage based solely upon the sex of the persons in the marriage union. Therefore, Section 1 of the Cherokee Nation Marriage and Family Act (“Act”), which defines marriage as “a civil contract between one man and one woman,” is  unconstitutional. Likewise, Section 3 of the Act, which prohibits marriage “between parties of the same gender,” is also unconstitutional. 

Second Circuit Rejects Another Challenge to Oneida Trust Acquisition

Here is the unpublished opinion in Central New York Fair Business Assn. v. Jewell (PDF).

Briefs:

Appellants Brief

Federal Brief

Oneida Brief

Appellants Reply

Lower court materials here.

Split Cal. COA Holds Gov. Brown’s Concurrence in North Fork Compact is Invalid

Here are the opinions in Stand Up For California v. State of California (PDF). An excerpt from the lead opinion:

The judgment is reversed. The Governor’s concurrence is invalid under the facts alleged in this case. Plaintiffs have stated a cause of action for a writ of mandate to set the concurrence aside on the ground that it is unsupported by legal authority. The matter is remanded for further proceedings, and the trial court is directed to vacate its order sustaining the demurrers and enter a new order overruling them.

Briefs:

Appellant Brief

California Brief

Reply Brief

Appellant Supplemental Brief

California Supplemental Brief

North Fork Supplemental Brief

Jacob Levy: “Authoritarianism and Post-Truth Politics”

Here.

An excerpt:

Saying something obviously untrue, and making your subordinates repeat it with a straight face in their own voice, is a particularly startling display of power over them. It’s something that was endemic to totalitarianism. Arendt analyzed the huge lies and blatant reversals of language associated with the Holocaust. Havel documented the pervasive little lies, lies that everyone knew to be lies, of late Communism. And Orwell gave us the vivid “2+2=5.”

Being made to repeat an obvious lie makes it clear that you’re powerless; it also makes you complicit. You’re morally compromised. Your ability to stand on your own moral two feet and resist or denounce is lost. Part of this is a general tool for making people part of immoral groups. One child makes a second abuse a third. The second then can’t think he’s any better than the first, the bully, and can’t inform. In a gang or the Mafia, your first kill makes you trustworthy, because you’re now dependent on the group to keep your secrets, and can’t credibly claim to be superior to them.