Here:
Question presented:
The question presented is: whether the Ninth Circuit’s decision contravenes the basic administrative law principle, established by this Court’s decisions, that an executive agency may change the policies of a previous administration based on the new administration’s different values and priorities, even though the relevant facts are unchanged.
Here:
Here are the materials in Matt v. United States (D. Mont.):
37 Fort Belknap Motion to Quash
40-1 Opposition to Motio to Quash
45 DCT Order Granting Motion to Quash
The underlying complaint against the US is here:
Here are the materials in Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. State of Wisconsin (W.D. Wis.):
This case is on remand from the CA7, materials here.
News coverage here.
Here is the unpublished opinion in ACF Leasing v. Oneida Seven Generations Corp. (PDF).
Briefs:
In the New York Times.
Here.
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.