Here is the opinion in South v. Lujan:

Here is the opinion in South v. Lujan:

Here:
Questions presented:
Lower court materials here.

Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether IGRA authorizes the approval of a compact that purports to allow for an online sports gambling monopoly throughout the state and off Indian lands.
2. Whether an IGRA compact violates the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act if it provides for internet sports betting that is unlawful where many of the bets are placed.
3. Whether the Secretary’s approval of a tribalstate compact violates equal protection principles where it provides a specific tribe with a monopoly on online sports gaming off tribal lands, while state law makes that conduct a felony for everyone else.
Lower court materials here.

Here:
Questions presented:
Whether the decision of the court of appeals conflicts with Carcieri?
Lower court materials here.


Beyond the First Year: Integrating Doctrine & Diversity, Volume 2 Release Celebration
Join us for an enriching webinar as we celebrate the release of “Beyond the First Year,” the latest volume in the Integrating Doctrine & Diversity series. Engage in a dynamic discussion with the series editors and gain valuable insights into weaving diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging into a variety of upper level courses. Listen to a selection of authors discuss their essays and offer practical strategies for enhancing your teaching throughout the upper-level curriculum. Don’t miss this opportunity to advance your approach and contribute to the evolving landscape of inclusive legal pedagogy.
This event is co-sponsored by Roger Williams University School of Law, City University of New York School of Law, George Washington University Law School, Berkeley Law, and JURIST.
2:00 PM – 3:30 PM EST
Seattle Times did an incredible profile of the case and its legacy back in January.

















You must be logged in to post a comment.