Stockbridge-Munsee/Ho-Chunk Nation/Wisconsin Gaming Compact Dispute Dismissed as Moot

Here are the materials in Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. State of Wisconsin (W.D. Wis.):

8 motion for pi

27 state response

37 ho-chunk response

39 reply

57 ho-chunk motion for judgment on pleadings

58 stockbridge opposition

62 reply

67 dct order

MSU/TICA Keynote Speaker Paul Spruhan

News Profile of the Federal Government’s Attack on the Chomorro Land Trust in Guam

Here is “The Feds Are Attacking a Program That Gives Indigenous People Land: A land trust in Guam set aside for native people is being sued by Trump’s Department of Justice because it won’t lease to non-natives.”

Federal Court Dismisses Effort to Overturn Fort Peck Appellate Court Probate Decision

Here are the materials in White Eagle-Payne v. Bemer (D. Mont.):

9 Motion to Dismiss

9-1 Ft. Peck Appellate Decision

14 Response

17 Magistrate Report

18 DCT Order

Toronto Star: “Justin Trudeau should name an Indigenous justice to the Supreme Court: Editorial”

Here.

HT Bash Man.

Ninth Circuit Decides Koniag v. Kanam

Here is the unpublished opinion.

Briefs:

opening brief

answer brief

reply brief

Washburn & Cummings: “Explaining the Modernized Leasing and Right-of-Way Regulations for Indian Lands”

Kevin Washburn & Jody Cummings have posted “Explaining the Modernized Leasing and Right-of-Way Regulations for Indian Lands.”

The abstract:

The Obama Administration enacted significant reforms to the regulatory rules governing federal leasing and right of way approvals across tribal lands in Parts 162 and 169 of the Indian title of the federal regulations. These reforms had many aims. They sought to improve the environment for economic development on Indian reservations by speeding regulatory approvals, increasing predictability (by, in part, narrowing agency discretion), and increasing deference to tribal governmental decisions. The reforms sought to help tribal governments capture economic value that had previously been denied them, for example, by preventing so called “piggybacking” on pre-existing rights of way and clarifying the rules of taxation related to economic activity. On the other hand, the reforms also sought to assure greater deference to tribal decisions, even when tribal governments act for non-economic purposes. For example, the agency will now defer to decisions to lease land for less than fair market value if a tribal government wishes for approval for other reasons. This descriptive work, prepared for a Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation conference in 2017, details these regulatory reforms.

Materials (So Far) in Oneida Nation v. Village of Hobart

Here:

1 Complaint

5 Oneida Motion for PI

10 Amended Complaint

25 Oneida Motion for Summary J

46 DCT Order on Preliminary Motions

60 Oneida Motion to Clarify

62 Hobart Response to Motion to Clarify

65 Oneida Reply re Motion to Clarify

66 DCT Order on Burdens of Proof

Ninth Circuit Remands Makah v. Quileute/Quinault Ocean U&A Dispute

Here is the opinion in Makah Indian Tribe v. Quileute Indian Tribe.

 Briefs are here.

Update on Same Sex Marriage Case at Ak-Chin Community

Here:

Redacted Special Master Report

Ruling on Matter Under Advisement (1) final Pablo