Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether a State may impose procedural or equitable bars to postconviction relief on the claim that the State lacked prosecutorial authority because the crime of conviction occurred in Indian country.
2. Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
3. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in State ex rel. Matloff v. Wallace:
Here are the materials in United States v. Billey (N.D. Okla.):
Here are the briefs in United States v. Smith:
Lower court materials here.
UPDATE: Unpublished memorandum here.
En banc petition here:
Here is the opinion and the materials in People v. Magnant:
Prior post here.
Here.
Here are the available materials in Scudero v. State:
Here is the petition and appendix:
Lower court materials here.
Question presented:
Is the Court of Indian Offenses of Ute Mountain Ute Agency a federal agency such that Merle Denezpi’s conviction in that court barred his subsequent prosecution in a United States District Court for a crime arising out of the same incident?
Update:
Here are materials so far in Young v. State of Oklahoma:
Update — the appellate court concluded McGirt did not apply and confirmed that the Osage reservation had been disestablished:
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.