Here.
NYT/AP Coverage of Tribal Advocacy in Favor of the SAVE Native Women Act
Here.
Here.
An excerpt from the ACLU site:
The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of New Mexico filed a lawsuit today on behalf of Shantelle Hicks, 15, who was initially kicked out of middle school and then publicly humiliated at an assembly by the school director and another staff member because she was pregnant.
The complaint alleges that school administrators violated Hicks’ constitutional right to equal protection under the law, Title IX’s prohibitions against sex and pregnancy discrimination and violations of her right to privacy.
“It was so embarrassing to have all the other kids staring at me as I walked into the gymnasium,” said Hicks. “I didn’t want the whole school to know I was pregnant because it’s not their business, and it wasn’t right for my teachers to single me out.”
***
Lawyers on this case include Klopfer, Alexandra Freedman Smith, Laura Schauer Ives and Maureen Sanders of the ACLU of New Mexico; and Sherwin and Lenora Lapidus of the ACLU Women’s Rights Project.
Read the full legal complaint: Hicks Complaint.
Here. Our post on the bill is here.
An excerpt:
Minnesota American Indian tribes and their allies in the state Legislature are seeking to plug a gap in child custody laws opened by a state Supreme Court decision last year.
The court’s decision derailed the common practice of giving tribal courts a role during pre-adoption and adoption for off-reservation American Indian kids.
Until the late 1970s, American Indian children across the country were adopted outside their communities at very high rates. The practice had a devastating effect on tribes, as generations of youth were cut loose from their cultural identities.
“People thought they understood that children would fare better if they were raised in white middle class homes,” said Andrew Small, a lawyer and former tribal judge in the state. “When you remove a child from their home, that begins a process that sometimes is impossible to stop… a child is going to be lost to the tribe.”
In 1978, Congress passed the Indian Child Welfare Act, which was designed to allow tribes a say in child custody and adoption proceedings. Since then, Minnesota state courts dealing with custody of an American Indian child off the reservation have been able to transfer jurisdiction to tribal court, even in the later part of the proceedings, which are called adoptive or pre-adoptive stages.
But a Minnesota Supreme Court decision late last year found a gap in the Indian Child Welfare Act. The court decided that neither federal nor Minnesota statute explicitly allowed state courts, when dealing with an American Indian child living away from a reservation, to transfer jurisdiction during the later portion of custody proceedings.
Here.
Here is the article.
As one commentator noted to us, the author must not have heard of Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation, last Term.
From How Appealing:
“How is the Roberts Court unusual? A law professor counts the ways.” Robert Barnes will have this article Monday in The Washington Post. A related graphic can be accessed here.
Thanks also to E.E.
Here.
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.