Pleadings (so far) in Insurance Company’s Effort to Avoid Navajo Nation District Court Jurisdiction

Here are the materials in Zurich American Insurance Company v. McPaul (D. Ariz.):

1 Complaint

1-2 Navajo Nation Complaint in Chinle D. Ct.

30 Zurich Motion for Summary J

32 Navajo Motion for Summary J

34 Zurich Response

35 Navajo Response

39 Zurich Reply

40 Navajo Reply

Innu Nation of Canada’s Opposition to Central Maine Power’s Transmission Line Permit

Here:

Innu Nation Press Release on CMP NE Clean Energy Connect

Discovery Dispute in Mille Lacs Reservation Boundaries Case

Here are the non-sealed materials in Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. County of Mille Lacs (D. Minn.):

96 Tribe Motion to Quash

110 Tribe Opposition to Motion to Compel

130 Magistrate Report

Prior post here.

Seventh Circuit Oral Argument in Wisconsin Oneida Reservation Boundaries Case

Here.

Briefs here.

Tenth Circuit Affirms Conviction for Robbery in Indian Country

Here is the opinion in United States v. Shirley.

SCOTUS Will Hear McGirt Argument Remotely in May — No Date Set Yet

Here.

McGirt background materials here.

Statement From Fort Belknap and Rosebud on KXL Lawsuit

On the same day the Trump Administration announced that up to 240,000 people may succumb to the COVID-19 virus, TransCanada announced it is proceeding with KXL pipeline construction. In fact, TransCanada outlined several activities scheduled for April all along the route of the pipeline, not just at the border. With this construction, workers will descend on the communities along the pipeline’s proposed path. TransCanada ignores the threat that this influx of people creates during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the face of the rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic, the Fort Belknap Indian Community and Rosebud Sioux Tribe asked the court to grant a temporary restraining order on pipeline construction. The Tribes are asking the court to put a short hold on construction until a hearing scheduled later this month.

“Fort Belknap has declared a state of emergency on the reservation because of the extremely dangerous COVID-19 pandemic and its threat to the health and well-being of the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine tribal members,” said President Werk of the Fort Belknap Indian Community, “We are very concerned about TransCanada bringing in outside construction workers from all over to build this pipeline within an hour from our reservation.”

“Rosebud has issued a curfew, closed businesses, and asked all to shelter in place because of the COVID-19 pandemic. We are joined in a fight against an invisible enemy that we now know is highly contagious before its hosts even show symptoms,” said President Bordeaux of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, “Based on these extraordinary circumstances, we ask that TransCanada halt any construction during this pandemic.”

A two-week delay in the face of a pandemic would seem like the obvious course of action. Instead, despite the danger to tribal citizens and all of the people living in the area, TransCanada is pushing to quickly build as much of the pipeline as possible. Of course, they can then use this ongoing construction as justification for allowing the project to proceed whether or not the project is legal.

“We are in unprecedented times, and to continue in the face of this pandemic and place our communities at greater risk is irresponsible,” said NARF Staff Attorney Matthew Campbell. “The KXL pipeline as currently routed violates the treaties, federal law, and tribal law. We’re asking that the United States honor its treaty obligation to protect Rosebud and Fort Belknap.”

#HonorTheTreaties

More information here.

Summary Judgment and Preliminary Injunction Briefs in Rosebud Sioux Tribe and Fort Belknap Indian Community v. Trump (Keystone XL)

Here are the Summary Judgment and Preliminary Injunction briefs regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline.

 

Previous posting on this issue here.

MHA Nation Member Wins Challenge to Secretarial Election Disenfranchising Off-Reservation Voters

Here are the materials in Hudson v. Zinke (D.D.C.):

32 Amended Complaint

35-1 Hudson MSJ

38 US MSJ

40 Hudson Reply

42 US Reply

53 DCT Order

61ibia253

64ibia010