New Jersey Court Declines to Find Fort Belknap Tribal Business Immune

Here are the materials in Ransom v. Greatplains Finance LLC (D.N.J.):

1 Notice of Removal

1-2 State Court Complaint

51-1 Motion to Dismiss

61 Response Brief Sealed

64 Reply

72 DCT Order

California COA Briefs in Tule Lake Committee v. Follis

Here:

Florida COA Holds Premature Tort Claim Against Seminole Does Not Foreclose Later Claim within Limitations Period

Here are the materials in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Pupo (Fla. Ct. App.):

Idaho Federal Court Dismisses Suit against Nez Perce Tribal Judiciary

Here are the materials in Souther v. Nez Perce Tribe Judicial Services (D. Idaho):

1 Complaint

4-1 Motion to Dismiss

8 Response

9 Reply

11 DCT Order

Ninth Circuit Briefs in L.B. v. United States [sexual assault by tribal police]

Here:

Other briefs TK.

Here are the federal district court materials:

Montana SCT decision here.

North Carolina Federal Court Dismisses Employment Action against Harrah’s EBCI Casino [Rule 19]

Here are the materials in Peterson v. Harrah’s NC Casino Company LLC (W.D. N.C.):

Eighth Circuit Rejects Claims of Standing Rock Protesters Injured by the Police

Here is the opinion in Dundon v. Kirchmeier.

Briefs:

Washington COA Holds Swinomish Golf Course Possesses Immunity

Here are the materials in Howson v. Similk Inc.:

SCOTUS Declines to Review Ninth Circuit’s Rule 19/Tribal Immunity Decision

Here is Monday’s order list.

The petition was Klamath Irrigation District v. Bureau of Reclamation: petition and opposition briefs.

California COA Affirms Application of Sovereign Immunity in Employment Termination Dispute

Here is the unpublished opinion in Mapp v. Viejas Band Of Kumeyaay Indians (Cal. Ct. App.):

An excerpt:

Mapp’s claims in this case relate to his employment by the Band and its potential termination based on the Band’s provision of a conditional license via its officials. He seeks to allege a violation of Family Code section 5290, which permits assessment of a civil penalty against an “employer” for specified conduct.9 That remedy and any judgment would be expressly against the Band. Mapp’s other damages related to negative employment decisions likewise would effectively obligate the Band, not personally the individuals who were implementing the Band’s gaming license rules and conditions. In short, the Band is the real party in interest, and sovereign immunity extends to the individual defendants.