Oglala Sioux Tribe Resolution Demanding BLM Consultation re: Converse County Oil and Gas Project (Wyo.)

Here:

1980_001 (2) (1)

The tribe’s press release:

OST PRESS RELEASE ON CONVERSE COUNTY OIL GAS PROJECT (3-27-18) (1)

UPDATE (4/11/2018):

FINAL AGENDA FOR GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT CONSULTATIOS (4-9-18).2

 

Washington v. United States Background Materials [culverts]

Oral argument transcript: oral argument transcript

Merits stage briefs:

17-269ts Petitioners Brief

17-269bsUnitedStates

17-269-bs-Tribal Respondents

Amici in Support of Petitioners:

Idaho and 10 Other States Brief

Pacific Legal Foundation Brief

Modoc Point Irrigation District Brief

Business Organizations Brief

Citizens Equal Rights Foundation Brief

American Forest & Paper Association and National Mining Association Brief

Washington State Association of Counties and Association of Washington Cities

Amici Supporting Respondents:

NCAI amicus brief

Fishermans Associations amicus brief

Warm Springs et al amicus brief

Daniel J. Evans amicus brief

State and Local Officials amicus brief

Professors amicus brief

Other docs:

Recusal Letter

Ninth Circuit panel decision here. Briefs:

State’s Opening Brief

Oregon Amicus

Tribal Brief

US Brief

Indian Law Professors

Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations

En banc stage briefs:

Washington Rehearing/En Banc Petition

Idaho and Montana Amicus Brief

Klamath Critical Habitat Landowners Amicus Brief

US Response

Tribal Response

District court materials are here:

Tribal Motion for Summary Judgment

State Motion for Summary Judgment

District Court Opinion

 

Bay Mills Indian Community Letter to Enbridge on Line 5

An important statement. Here:

Letter to Enbridge.3.23.18

Federal Court Rejects Yankton Sioux Arguments on Dakota Access Pipeline

Here are the materials in the consolidated cases known as Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.):

292 Yankton Sioux Tribe Motion for Summary J

317-1 Army Corps Response

319 Dakota Access Response

324 Reply

341 DCT Order

U.S. v. Oregon Dismissed.

The U.S. District Court has terminated its continuing jurisdiction sua sponteHere.

NYTs: “The Next Standing Rock? A Pipeline Battle Looms in Oregon”

Here.

The Next Standing Rock? A Pipeline Battle Looms in Oregon

New York Times Op-Ed:

After dams were built on the river starting in 1912, the salmon were blocked. Today the only “c’iyaals hoches” (salmon runs) are enacted by the Klamath Tribes, whose members carry carved cedar salmon on a 300-mile symbolic journey from the ocean to the traditional spawning grounds to bring home the spirit of the fish.

HERE.

United States Tax Court Holds Income Earned from Seneca Lands is Taxable

Here is the opinion in Perkins v. Commissioner:

Opinion

Maine Court Denies Maliseet Indian Motion to Dismiss Fishing Prosecution

Here is the order in State v. Bear:

WALcr-16-636

The State of Washington’s Opening Brief in the Culverts Case

Here. Previous coverage here.