Farmers Union Oil v. Guggolz — Plains Commerce Bank Redux

This is a case before the same trial judge as in Plains Commerce Bank in the D.S.D. This one is a slip and fall, but Farmers Union Oil the defendant in tribal court at Standing Rock. The judge followed Plains Commerce Bank and many other similar decisions in requiring the exhaustion of tribal court remedies, but then he took an unfortunate potshot at the CA8 opinion in Plains Commerce Bank:

I have previously cited in this order and opinion the case of Plains Commerce. I was the trial judge in that case. The case was affirmed on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. As I read the appellate opinion, I was struck by the fact that such opinion would clearly and substantially broaden the jurisdiction of tribal courts in the Eighth Circuit. It would allow tribal courts to decide what common law principles were to be applied in tribal courts. This would be a significant expansion of tribal court jurisdiction in civil cases. In the past few days, I have noted that the United States Supreme Court has granted the petition of Plains Commerce for a writ of certiorari. Apparently, we will have further guidance from the Supreme Court.

Continue reading

U.S. v. Gonzales et al. — Makah Whalers — Hearing re Pre Trial Motions

In response to the pre-trial motions that have been filed, the district court will hear these motions on February 19 and 20, 2008. There will be a full evidentiary hearing on these motions. The court also granted the Makah Tribe’s motion for leave to appear as amicus in this case.

DCT Scheduling Order

Continue reading

CA10 Interprets Muscogee (Creek) Secured Transactions Law

The case is In re Harper (Malloy v. Wilserv CU). The CA10 held that tribal law gaps forced the court to resort to Oklahoma law, which appears to have undermined the purpose of having tribal law in the first place. It’s a bankruptcy case, with commercial law as a backdrop.

Here are the materials:

Continue reading

MacArthur v. San Juan County Materials

The materials on MacArthur v. San Juan County (No. 07-701) are here. The petition is set for the Court’s conference on Feb. 15.

Tenth Circuit Opinion

Cert Petition

Cert Opp

Reply

Continue reading

Report on Public Law 280 and Sexual Assault on Native Women

From Sarah Deer:

On August 15 – 16, 2007 the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) hosted a focus group in Green Bay, Wisconsin to discuss challenges to, and opportunities for, collaboration between states and tribes in Public Law 280 jurisdictions to address sexual assault in Indian country. The Tribal Law and Policy Institute (TLPI) provided technical assistance and collaborated with OVW on the design and delivery of the session. This final report details the event.

Dissent at Little River

From the Ludington Daily News:

Tribal office picketed

Some members voice displeasure with tribal council

Thursday, January 17, 2008

MANISTEE — Several members of the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians carried signs and spoke against the tribal council outside the tribe’s offices Wednesday morning.

Continue reading

Atwood v. Fort Peck Tribal Court (CA9)

This is a tribal court exhaustion case out of the Ninth Circuit (with Judge Canby sitting on the panel):

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss — DCT

DCT Order

Continue reading

July 2007 NY State Bar Exam Indian Law Question

We know that Washington, New Mexico, and South Dakota have Indian law on the state bar exam, but so did the July 2007 New York state bar(!!!!).

Update from Paul Spruhan: The question came from a “multistate performance test” that is created by the National Conference of Bar Examiners and administered in all states that utilize the MPT.  The MPT is an additional part of those states’ bar exams in addition to the essays and multi-state multiple choice exam (here’s their web site: http://www.ncbex.org/multistate-tests/mpt/)

Continue reading

Navajo Gaming Loan Threatened

We blogged previously about the lawsuit filed in Navajo tribal court over the proposed Navajo gaming loan. It turns out the lawsuit was successful in apparently causing the lender to change the terms of the deal (H/T Indianz). This is an interesting development and probably not a welcome one from the perspective of gaming tribes. If tribal court lawsuits challenging the terms of a gaming-related loan, or in this case the authority of the Navajo legislature to approve the loan, are successful in any area, my guess is the price for loans will go up everywhere.

Update: No suit has been filed in the Navajo Nation courts.  The 30 day waiting period required by the Navajo Sovereign Immunity Act (the title doesn’t use “Nation”) just expired and we were preparing to file suit.  There has been no public announcement, but there are rumors to the effect that the notice of suit stopped the loan.  They are now looking at other sources of funding for the casino, such as a trust fund set aside for acquiring land.

From Indianz:

Continue reading

Leech Lake Tribal Attorney Fired

From the Bemidji Pioneer:

Leech Lake Tribal Council members vote to fire legal director who was investigating them

Molly Miron Bemidji Pioneer
DL-Online – 01/14/2008

Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Legal Director Michael Garbow was put out of his job and locked out of his office Friday in a ruling by a faction of the Leech Lake Tribal Council.

Continue reading