North Dakota SCT Affirms State Court Jurisdiction over Reservation Housing Eviction Matter

Here is the opinion in Gustafson v. Poitra: Opinion

Excerpt:

Linus and Raymond Poitra appeal the district court judgment of eviction. The Poitras argue the district court erred by exercising jurisdiction over this matter, and by sending a North Dakota law enforcement officer onto the reservation to evict tribal members from property within the Turtle Mountain Reservation. We affirm.

Briefs:

Appellant Brief

Appellee Brief

Wolters Kluwer (Aspen) Publishes Second Edition of Fletcher’s American Indian Tribal Law

Website here.

Federal Court Rejects Immunity Defense to Nonmember Challenge to Tribal Jurisdiction

Here are the materials in Big Horn County Elec. Coop. v. Big Man (D. Mont.):

79 Tribal Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

80 Response

81 Reply in Support of 79

83-4 Plaintiff Motion for Summary Judgment

85 Big Man Motion for Summary Judgment

88 Tribal Board Motion for Summary Judgment

97 Magistrate Report

98 DCT Order Denying 79

Prior post here.

Alex Skibine on Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction over Nonmembers [now published]

Alex Tallchief Skibine has published “Incorporation Without Assimilation: Legislating Tribal Civil Jurisdiction over Nonmembers” in the UCLA Law Review Discourse.

The abstract:

For the last forty years the U.S. Supreme Court has been engaged in a measured attack on the sovereignty of Indian tribes when it comes to tribal court jurisdiction over people who are not members of the tribe asserting that jurisdiction. The U.S. Congress has already enacted legislation partially restoring some tribal courts’ criminal jurisdiction over nonmembers. This Article proposes to legislatively reconfirm the civil jurisdiction of tribal courts over such nonmembers. After examining the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence in this area and summarizing the Court’s main concerns with such tribal jurisdiction, this Article explores various legislative options before settling on a preferred course of action. The proposal set forth in the last part of this Article would reconfirm tribal court civil jurisdiction over nonmembers provided the tribal courts has established personal jurisdiction over the parties. However, tribal courts’ determinations on this subject would be appealable to federal courts. Furthermore, the Article proposes to allow nonmembers being sued in tribal courts the option of removing their cases to federal courts under certain conditions.

Pokagon Band Potawatomi Tribal Court Open House

Chief Judge Mike Petoskey

Chief Judge Mike Petoskey and Chairman Matt Wesaw

Steve Rambeaux and the indoor peacemaking fire pit

MF with former Pokagon chairman John Warren
MF with Andi Jackson and Clarence White

Kansas SCT Disciplines Kansas Kickapoo Tribe’s Public Defender

Here is the order:

opinion.pdf

Federal Court Partially Dismisses Oglala Sioux Tribal Member’s Grazing Suit against Feds

Here are the materials in Temple v. Roberts (previously Temple v. Her Many Horses (D.S.D.):

155-motion-to-dismiss.pdf

159-opposition.pdf

168-reply.pdf

173-motion-to-quash.pdf

176-response.pdf

177-reply.pdf

180-1-oglala-sioux-tribal-court-opinion.pdf

183-dct-on-motion-to-dismiss.pdf

184-dct-granting-motion-to-quash.pdf

Prior post here.

Federal Court Dismisses Challenge to Ute Banishment

Here is the order in Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribal Court of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (D. Utah):

85-dct-order.pdf

Briefs here.

Navajo Sues Interior over Judicial Funding

Here is the complaint in Navajo Nation v. Dept. of the Interior (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

Federal Court Materials in Ute Banishment Case

Here are the materials so far in Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribal Court of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (D. Utah):

2-complaint.pdf

20-motion-for-immediate-release.pdf

46-tribe-motion-to-dismiss.pdf

47-response-to-mtd.pdf

53-reply-in-support-of-motion-for-release.pdf

54-reply-in-support-of-mtd.pdf

73-motion-for-atty-fees.pdf

77-response-to-motion-for-atty-fees.pdf

79-reply-in-support-of-motion-for-atty-fees.pdf

82-motion-to-intervene.pdf

83-dct-order-denying-intervention.pdf