Here are the materials in Pearson v. United Debt Holdings (N.D. Ill.):
tribal courts
Fourth Circuit Briefs in Arbitration Case Arising from the Wreckage of Western Sky
Here are the briefs in Hayes v. Delbert Services Corp.:
Lower court materials here.
Article – Improving State Court-Tribal Court Relations (Summer 2015)
Cribbing from a message sent by Gina Jackson at Casey:
See article by Judge Len Edwards (Ret.) on Improving State Court-Tribal Court Relations. The article has an appendix with great ideas as well. Judge Edwards has some other great resources here- http://judgeleonardedwards.com/
Excerpt-
“…there is judicial expertise and leadership that can be tapped through the Tribal Court – State Court Forum, a coalition of the various tribal court and state court leaders who come together as equal partners to address areas of mutual concern.”
Link to article here- https://app.box.com/s/y6e1cs7u8h0dw68i6ztbzo4ob403zz5b
To learn more about the California Tribal-State Judicial Forum, see website link here- http://www.courts.ca.gov/programs-tribal.htm
Job Posting: Klamath Tribes Court Administrator
Here.
Eastern Band Cherokee Press Release on Domestic Violence Prosecution under VAWA
TLPI 4th Annual Healing to Wellness Court Enhancement Training, Sept. 8-10
Here.
Among many other presenters, Fort & Vicaire will be talking about tribal veterans courts, family law, and (you guessed it) ICWA.
Law School Clinical Assistance Webinar on VAWA Enhanced Jurisdiction
Here.
This webinar will focus on ways for law school clinics to provide assistance to tribes seeking to exercise the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) 2013 enhanced jurisdiction. Indian tribes now have the general authority to implement criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians who violate protective orders or commit domestic violence or dating violence against Indian victims on tribal lands. Tribes wishing to exercise this Special Domestic Violence Criminal Jurisdiction over non-Indians (SDVCJ) must provide certain rights to criminal defendants and meet certain legal requirements.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Seeks Licensed Appellate Judge
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Jensen v. EXC Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether federal courts are free to ignore congressionally confirmed Indian treaty rights that impliedly reserve tribal jurisdiction over nonmember conduct within an Indian reservation, thereby effecting an impermissible judicial abrogation of those treaty rights.
2. Whether federal courts may disregard the Supreme Court’s multifactor analysis for determining the status of a roadway existing on tribal trust land when deciding if an Indian tribe has inherent sovereign jurisdiction to adjudicate a collision occurring on that roadway between a tribally regulated tour bus and a passenger vehicle carrying tribal members.3. Whether federal courts may decline to apply the consensual relationship exception of Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981), because nonmember conduct occurred on land deemed to be the equivalent of non-Indian fee land, where (a) the Supreme Court has indicated that Montana’s consensual relationship exception can justify tribal jurisdiction over nonmember conduct occurring on non-Indian fee land or its equivalent, and (b) there exists a consensual relationship of the qualifying kind between the tribe and the nonmembers.
4. Whether federal courts may deny that an Indian tribe has inherent civil jurisdiction, pursuant to the second Montana exception, over nonmembers’ commercial touring of tribal lands that results in a fatal tour bus/auto collision where (a) the nonmembers’ conduct implicates the tribe’s interests in governing itself, controlling internal relations, and superintending land use, and (b) the impact of the commercial touring activity, unconstrained by tribal regulatory authority, is demonstrably serious and imperils the tribe’s sovereign interests.
Lower court materials here.
Survey of Tribal Child Welfare Codes by NNI and NICWA
Poster version of the research here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.